Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35516461›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational radiation oncology2022

A prospective study assessing the pattern of response of local disease at DCE-MRI after salvage radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

Marta Bottero, Adriana Faiella, Diana Giannarelli, Alessia Farneti, Pasqualina D'Urso, Luca Bertini, Valeria Landoni, Patrizia Vici, Giuseppe Sanguineti

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational radiation oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04703543 (Pilot Study Evaluating the Role of Both PSMA and 64Cu-PET/CT Total Body in Patients With Locally Relapsed Prostate Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 53% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04703543 nacompletednot on this map

Pilot Study Evaluating the Role of Both PSMA and 64Cu-PET/CT Total Body in Patients With Locally Relapsed Prostate Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorRegina Elena Cancer InstituteRan2017 to 2020Enrolled50ConditionsProstate NeoplasmsArmsPilot evaluation study on use PSMA and Cu-PET/CT
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marta BotteroRadiation Oncology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Adriana FaiellaRadiation Oncology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Diana GiannarelliBiostatistics, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Alessia FarnetiRadiation Oncology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Pasqualina D'UrsoRadiation Oncology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Luca BertiniRadiology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Valeria LandoniPhysics, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Patrizia ViciPhase IV Studies, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Giuseppe SanguinetiRadiation Oncology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: To assess the pattern of response of presumed local lesions at dynamic contrast enhancement magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) after salvage radiotherapy (sRT). Methods: This is a prospective study conducted at a single Institution accruing patients with one or more local failures at DCE-MRI after radical prostatectomy between August 2017 and June 2020. Patients underwent exclusive sRT delivering 66-69 Gy and 73.5 Gy in 30 fractions to the whole prostatic fossa and to the local failure(s) seen at DCE-MRI, respectively.Patients were offered DCE-MRI at 3 months intervals after sRT until complete disappearance (CR) of the lesion(s) or up to a maximum of 4 revaluations. Results: 62 patients with 72 nodules were enrolled. All patients underwent the 1st revaluation, and 33 patients (53.2%) showed a CR. The median time to CR was 4.7 months. Four patients did not undergo further testing before achieving a CR and even considering these patients as no responses, the vast majority (87.1%, 95%CI: 78.5-94.4%) of lesions would have completely disappeared by 12 months from the end of sRT.The volume of the lesion at pre-sRT DCE-MRI was an independent predictor of CR at the 1st revaluation (OR: 0.076, 95%CI: 0.009-0.667; p = 0.020) along with time elapsed from sRT (OR: 3.399, 95% CI: 1.156-9.993, p = 0.026). Conclusions: The present study documents the complete disappearance of the vast majority of local lesions after dose-escalated sRT though this requires several months after sRT; timing of CR is at least in part predictable based on the volume of the lesion.Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04703543, registered July 15 2020, retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04703543.

Indexed as

Dynamic contrast enhancement magnetic resonance imagingLocal failureProstate cancerSalvage radiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID35516461
PMCPMC9065465
OpenAlexW4226061602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.