ArticleComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2022
Effect and Significance of High-Quality Nursing on Blood Glucose, Pregnancy Outcome, and Neonatal Complications of Patients with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus.
Article in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Retracted: Effect and Significance of High-Quality Nursing on Blood Glucose, Pregnancy Outcome, and Neonatal Complications of Patients with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-12-06Compromised Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Paper Mill · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To explore the role of high-quality nursing on blood glucose, pregnancy outcome, and neonatal complications in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus. Methods: Altogether, 148 patients with GDM admitted to our hospital were selected as the research participants, 83 of whom received high-quality nursing as the observation group (OG). Another 65 patients received only routine care as the control group (CG). The blood sugar level, blood pressure value, and adverse pregnancy outcomes of the OG and the CG of patients after intervention were compared. The changes of psychological state and nursing satisfaction of the OG and the CG of patients were observed. The blood lipid level and neonatal complications of the OG and the CG were detected. Results: The blood sugar level of the OG was lower than that of the CG ( Conclusion: High-quality nursing can reduce blood sugar and blood pressure of GDM patients and has a great protective effect on maternal and infant health, which is worthy of clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.