Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35516444›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2022

Diabetes care and its predictors among persons experiencing homelessness compared with domiciled adults with diabetes in New York City; An observational study.

Ramin Asgary, Elena Beideck, Rosanna Naderi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Social Needs and Type 2 Diabetes in Latinos: An Integrative Review.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ramin AsgaryMilken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, 950 New Hampshire Ave NW, Washington, D.C. 20052, USA.
Elena BeideckWeill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, 525 East 68th Street, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Rosanna NaderiMilken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, 950 New Hampshire Ave NW, Washington, D.C. 20052, USA.
Milken Institute · USCornell University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: There is a dearth of data regarding diabetes control among patients experiencing homelessness. Methods: We retrospectively collected type 2 diabetes-related measurements, sociodemographic, and clinical indicators from medical records of all incoming adults with diabetes ( Findings: Bivariate analysis showed that patients experiencing homelessness (63% Black; 32% Hispanic) 134/304 (43⋅9%) were more likely than domiciled patients 13/57 (22·8%) to have inadequately managed diabetes (OR 2⋅67, CI 1·38-5·16, Interpretation: Interventions at shelters or shelter-clinics should target subgroups in addition to addressing traditional risk factors to improve diabetes control. mHealth strategies could be considered to improve engagement, care delivery, and medication taking. Ultimately, homelessness itself needs to be addressed. Funding: There are no funding sources to declare.

Indexed as

BMI, body mass indexBP, blood pressureCAD, coronary artery diseaseCKD, chronic kidney diseaseDiabetes mellitusDM, diabetes mellitusGFR, glomerular filtration rateHbA1c, hemoglobin A1cHealth disparitiesHomelessHTN, hypertensionLDL, low density lipoproteinPCP, primary care physicianPrimary careQuality care

Identifiers

PMID35516444
PMCPMC9062666
OpenAlexW4229065525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.