Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35516078›Full record

ArticleBMJ simulation & technology enhanced learning2020

The Meta-Debrief Club: an effective method for debriefing your debrief.

Chris Iain O'Shea, Christopher Schnieke-Kind, Dan Pugh, Evie Picton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ simulation & technology enhanced learning, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Exploring the Meta-debrief: Developing a Toolbox for Debriefing the Debrief.Simulation in healthcare : journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Managing psychological safety in debriefings: a dynamic balancing act.BMJ simulation & technology enhanced learning · 2020
    Review
  8. Considerations for psychological safety with system-focused debriefings.BMJ simulation & technology enhanced learning · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chris Iain O'SheaMedical Education Directorate, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8230-0151
Christopher Schnieke-KindMedical Education Directorate, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK.
Dan PughMedical Education Directorate, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK.
Evie PictonEdinburgh Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

debriefingdeliberate practicefaculty developmentreflective practicesimulation

Identifiers

PMID35516078
PMCPMC8948357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.