Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35515969›Full record

ArticleSisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni2022

The Efficiency of Fractional Anisotropy, Apparent Diffusion Coefficient, and Contrast Enhancement Index in Liver Fibrosis Staging.

Umut Percem Orhan Soylemez, Deniz Turkyilmaz Mut, Canan Alatas Alkim, Huseyin Alkim, Banu Yılmaz Ozguven, Salih Boga, Muzaffer Basak, Sukru Mehmet Erturk

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Umut Percem Orhan SoylemezDepartment of Radiology, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Goztepe City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8164-7847
Deniz Turkyilmaz MutDepartment of Radiology, Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Teaching and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2966-3935
Canan Alatas AlkimDepartment of Gastroenterohepatology, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6388-518X
Huseyin AlkimDepartment of Gastroenterohepatology, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7875-0627
Banu Yılmaz OzguvenDepartment of Pathology, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Basaksehir Cam ve Sakura City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3540-4772
Salih BogaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Istanbul Bahcelievler Memorial Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9438-1702
Muzaffer BasakDepartment of Radiology, Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Teaching and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8411-5694
Sukru Mehmet ErturkDepartment of Radiology, Istanbul University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4086-675X
Istanbul Medeniyet University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Even though magnetic resonance imaging has been described as the most effective imaging method for the diagnosis of liver fibrosis, an accepted magnetic resonance ımaging (MRI) technique is yet to be defined. The aim of this study is to determine the efficiency of MRI in the staging of liver fibrosis. Methods: Patients with chronic hepatitis B infection and had upper abdominal MRI with hepatocyte specific contrast agent were evaluated. Twenty-nine patients that had undergone liver biopsy were included in the study. ADC, FA, and signal intensity values of liver parenchyma were measured by two observers and contrast enhancement index (CEI) was calculated as well. Patients were grouped as early (A) and late fibrosis(B) according to Ishak grading system and then the correlations between the stage and MRI findings were analysed. The intraclass correlation coefficient was used to analyze the inter-rater agreements. ADC, FA, and CEI were compared with Student t-test between early and late fibrosis groups. Pearson's correlation was used to assess the correlation between ADC and FA values. Spearman correlation was used to evaluate the relationship between pathologic fibrosis grade and MRI parameters that were measured. Results: Twenty-two patients were staged as 1 and 2 (group A), seven patients were staged as 3 and above fibrosis(group B). Statistically, there was a strong, negative correlation between the FA values and the degree of fibrosis (r=-0.582, p=0.001). There was no correlation between the CEI and hepatocyte activity index (r=-0.88, p=0.655) and degree of fibrosis (r=0.0001, p=0.997). In terms of FA values, there was a statistically significant difference between two groups (group A=0.429 ± 0.06, group B=0.349 ± 0.06) (p=0.004). Conclusion: Correlation of FA values with fibrosis stage and significant difference in FA values between early-late stage fibrosis patients shows that diffusion tensor imaging can be a promising technique in the staging and follow-up of liver fibrosis.

Indexed as

Contrast agentdiffusion magnetic resonance imaginghepatitis Bliver cirrhosismagnetic resonance ımaging

Identifiers

PMID35515969
PMCPMC9040295
OpenAlexW3217122705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.