ArticleSisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni2022
Lymphocyte to Monocyte Ratio and C-Reactive Protein Combination as the Best Simple Predictor of Treatment Response in Cirrhotic Patients with Culture Negative Neutrocytic Ascites.
Article in Sisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Culture-Negative Neutrocytic Ascites in a Patient With Cardiac Ascites From End-Stage Heart Failure.Cureus · 2024Article
- Hyperammonemia and Hepatic Encephalopathy in Pediatric and Adult Liver Intensive Care Unit.Sisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni · 2023Article
- The Role of Serum Inflammation-Based Scores in Diagnosis and Assessing Remission in Cushing's Disease.Sisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni · 2023Article
- Naples Prognostic Score and Clinical Outcomes in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Patients.Sisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni · 2023Article
- Can the Combination of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Predict the Mass Origin in Ovarian Masses?Sisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the most ideal inflammatory markers for treatment response and to determine a cutoff value that could predict response to treatment for culture negative neutrocytic ascite (CNNA) patients. Methods: This is a retrospective cross-sectional case-controlled study. Patients with CNNA were evaluated by taking ascites fluid sampling at the beginning and on the 5 Results: Of the 123 cases with cirrhotic ascites disease, 59 were CCNA and 64 were the control group without ascite-fluid infection. There were statistically significant differences for blood monocyte count, NLR (p<0.01), LMR, and C-reactive protein (CRP) (p<0.001) between two groups. Patients in the CNNA group were compared before and after treatment among themselves for the treatment response. There was statistically significant difference in mean platelet volume, monocyte, LMR, and CRP (p<0.05) between two groups. After receiver operator characteristics curve analysis, the best cutoff value for monocyte was <0.64 × 10 Conclusion: Our results showed that in cirrhotic patients with CNNA, combined LMR + CRP can be used as a novel, low cost and non-invasive test to predict treatment response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.