ReviewRSC advances2020
Tumor microenvironment triggered biodegradation of inorganic nanoparticles for enhanced tumor theranostics.
Review in RSC advances, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Design of prodrugs with reactive oxygen species as activators and their application in tumor therapy.Theranostics · 2026Review
- Engineered nanoparticles for imaging and targeted drug delivery in hepatocellular carcinoma.Experimental hematology & oncology · 2025Review
- Nanotechnology-based non-viral vectors for gene delivery in cardiovascular diseases.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Review
- Research progress of nanovaccine in anti-tumor immunotherapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
- Effects of morphology and size of nanoscale drug carriers on cellular uptake and internalization process: a review.RSC advances · 2022Review
- The potential of oxygen and nitrogen species-regulating drug delivery systems in medicine.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inorganic nanoparticles (NPs)-mediated tumor theranostics have attracted widespread attention due to their unique physicochemical properties, such as optical, electrical, magnetic, and thermal properties. In the past decade, great advancements have been made in inorganic NPs-associated drug delivery, multimodal tumor imaging, and tumor therapy. However, the potential toxicity of inorganic NPs due to their low biodegradability, background signals interference and treatment side effects limit their clinical application. Therefore, developing biodegradable and intelligent NPs is beneficial to avoid excessive metal ions deposition, specific tumor imaging and treatment. In this review, we summarize the recent advances in tumor microenvironment (TME)-triggered biodegradation of inorganic NPs accompanied by imaging signal amplification and the released ions-mediated tumor therapy. First, the feature characteristics of the TME are introduced, including mild acidity, hypoxia, overexpressed reactive oxygen species (ROS), glutathione (GSH), and enzymes
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.