ArticleBMJ simulation & technology enhanced learning2021
Peer-assisted learning in simulation-based medical education: a mixed-methods exploratory study.
Article in BMJ simulation & technology enhanced learning, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Collaborative Simulation-Based Learning to Develop Competencies in Physical Therapy Students: Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR medical education · 2026Trial
- Enhancing Radiation Oncology Delineation Skills Through Simulation-Based Learning (SBL): A Five-Step Practical Approach Using the ADDIE Model.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026Review
- Medical students' perception of the OSCE: development and validation of an instrument to assess formative and summative modalities.Einstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2026Article
- Peer-assisted learning in critical care: a simulation-based approach for postgraduate medical training.Medical education online · 2025Article
- Navigating professional identities: nursing faculty as embedded simulation participants in medical student simulations.Advances in simulation (London, England) · 2025Article
- Reflecting realities: gauging the pulse of simulator-based training in medical minds-resonance of simulator-based ultrasound training in medical education.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Application of CPBL combined with mind mapping in acute abdomen clinical training to improve post-training competence.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Educational design insights for interprofessional immersive simulation to prepare allied health students for clinical placements.Advances in simulation (London, England) · 2024Article
- Developing and Implementing a Training Programme for Medical Students to Become Peer Educators in Simulation-Based Education.Medical science educator · 2024Article
- Comparing reflection levels between facilitator-led and student-led debriefing in simulation training for paramedic students.Advances in simulation (London, England) · 2023Article
- Quality Assessment and Modulating Factors on Self-Regulatory Behavior in Peer-Assisted Medical Learning.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Promoting medical student engagement through co-development and peer-assisted learning: a new patient safety course as a case study.Advances in simulation (London, England) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Peer-assisted learning (PAL) is well described in medical education but there has been little research on its application in simulation-based education (SBE). This exploratory study aimed to determine the perceptions of senior medical students at two universities to teaching and learning in SBE using PAL (PAL-SBE). Methods: Ninety-seven medical students at two universities working in small groups with facilitator oversight wrote, ran and debriefed a simulation scenario for their peers.This was a mixed-methods study. Participants completed a written free-text and Likert survey instrument, and participated in a facilitated focus group immediately after the scenario. Thematic analysis was performed on the free-text and focus group transcripts. Results: Student-led scenarios ran without major technical issues. Instructor presence was required throughout scenario delivery and debrief, making the exercise resource intensive. Participant responses were more positive regarding learning as peer teachers in simulation than they were regarding participation as a peer learner. Five themes were identified: learning in the simulated environment; teaching in the simulated environment; teaching peers and taking on an educator role; learning from peers; and time and effort expended. Perceived benefits included learning in depth through scenario writing, improved knowledge retention, understanding the patient's perspective and learning to give feedback through debriefing. Conclusion: PAL in SBE is feasible and was perceived positively by students. Perceived benefits appear to be greater for the peer teachers than for peer learners.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.