Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35515338›Full record

ArticleEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2022

Assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) No 2016/429): antimicrobial-resistant

EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW), Søren Saxmose Nielsen, Dominique Joseph Bicout, Paolo Calistri, Elisabetta Canali, Julian Ashley Drewe, Bruno Garin-Bastuji, José Luis Gonzales Rojas, Christian Gortázar, Mette Herskin and 14 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Veterinary Clinics as Reservoirs forAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Outbreak of Carbapenem-Resistant High-Risk Clone ST244 ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  10. Impact of Antimicrobial Resistance ofVeterinary sciences · 2025
    Review
  11. Successful phage-antibiotic therapy ofThe veterinary quarterly · 2024
    Article
  12. Does Every Strain ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. The Impact of the Virulence ofVeterinary sciences · 2023
    Article
  18. Antimicrobial resistance and genotyping ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Mycoplasma cynos-Associated Canine Infectious Respiratory Disease Complex Pneumonia in 13 Dogs.Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care (San Antonio, Tex. : 2001)
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW)
Søren Saxmose Nielsen
Dominique Joseph Bicout
Paolo Calistri
Elisabetta Canali
Julian Ashley Drewe
Bruno Garin-Bastuji
José Luis Gonzales Rojas
Christian Gortázar
Mette Herskin
Virginie Michel
Miguel Ángel Miranda Chueca
Barbara Padalino
Paolo Pasquali
Helen Clare Roberts
Hans Spoolder
Karl Ståhl
Antonio Velarde
Arvo Viltrop
Christoph Winckler
Francesca Baldinelli
Alessandro Broglia
Lisa Kohnle
Julio Alvarez
Animal Welfare Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Animal Health Lawantimicrobial resistancecategorisationimpactlistingPseudomonas aeruginosa

Identifiers

PMID35515338
PMCPMC9063721
OpenAlexW4225292979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.