ArticleEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2022
Epidemiological analyses of African swine fever in the European Union: (September 2020 to August 2021).
Article in EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Systematic Literature Review of Variables Associated with the Occurrence of African Swine Fever.Viruses · 2025Pooled it
- Epidemiological analysis of African swine fever in the European Union during 2025.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2026Article
- Integrated Hunting Strategies for African Swine Fever Control in Wild Boar: A Comparative Review of Experiences in European Continent.Veterinary sciences · 2026Review
- African swine fever control in the context of endemic persistence.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
- Six-year surveillance of African Swine Fever in pigs and wild boars in an outbreak-origin region of Romania.Journal of veterinary science · 2025Article
- Investigating the role of stable flies (Stomoxys calcitrans) and biting midges of the genus Culicoides as potential mechanical vectors of African swine fever virus in Lithuania, Poland and Romania.Parasites & vectors · 2025Article
- Epidemiological analysis of African swine fever in the European Union during 2024.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2025Article
- African Swine Fever: A One Health Perspective and Global Challenges.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Review
- Risk Factors for African Swine Fever in Wild Boar in Russia: Application of Regression for Classification Algorithms.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Impact of Carcass Detection Delays on the Sustained Transmission of African Swine Fever Among Wild Boars.Transboundary and emerging diseases · 2025Article
- Article
- Exploratory Report of Wild Boar Surveillance and Epidemiological Course of African Swine Fever Outbreak; Case in the Republic of Korea From 2019 to 2023.Transboundary and emerging diseases · 2025Article
- Prospective Case-Control Study of Determinants for African Swine Fever Introduction in Commercial Pig Farms in Poland, Romania, and Lithuania.Transboundary and emerging diseases · 2025Article
- Testing a Susceptible Population Density Among Other Explanatory Factors of African Swine Fever Spread in Wild Boar Using the Russian Federation Data, 2007-2023.Transboundary and emerging diseases · 2025Article
- A spatially-heterogeneous impact of fencing on the African swine fever wavefront in the Korean wild boar population.Veterinary research · 2024Article
- Risk and protective factors for ASF in domestic pigs and wild boar in the EU, and mitigation measures for managing the disease in wild boar.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2024Article
- Review
- Epidemiological analysis of African swine fever in the European Union during 2023.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2024Article
- Evaluation of alternative methods of tunnel composting (submitted by the European Composting Network) II.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2024Article
- Vulnerability assessment of food imports-Conceptual framework and empirical application to the case of Switzerland.Heliyon · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
28 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This report provides a descriptive analysis of the African swine fever (ASF) Genotype II epidemic in the affected Member States in the EU and two neighbouring countries for the period from 1 September 2020 to 31 August 2021. ASF continued to spread in wild boar in the EU, it entered Germany in September 2020, while Belgium became free from ASF in October 2020. No ASF outbreaks in domestic pigs nor cases in wild boar have been reported in Greece since February 2020. In the Baltic States, overall, there has been a declining trend in proportions of polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-positive samples from wild boar carcasses in the last few years. In the other countries, the proportions of PCR-positive wild boar carcasses remained high, indicating continuing spread of the disease. A systematic literature review revealed that the risk factors most frequently significantly associated with ASF in domestic pigs were pig density, low levels of biosecurity and socio-economic factors. For wild boar, most significant risk factors were related to habitat, socio-economic factors and wild boar management. The effectiveness of different control options in the so-named white zones, areas where wild boar densities have been drastically reduced to avoid further spread of ASF after a new introduction, was assessed with a stochastic model. Important findings were that establishing a white zone is much more challenging when the area of ASF incursion is adjacent to an area where limited control measures are in place. Very stringent wild boar population reduction measures in the white zone are key to success. The white zone needs to be far enough away from the affected core area so that the population can be reduced in time before the disease arrives and the timing of this will depend on the wild boar density and the required population reduction target in the white zone. Finally, establishing a proactive white zone along the demarcation line of an affected area requires higher culling efforts, but has a higher chance of success to stop the spread of the disease than establishing reactive white zones after the disease has already entered in the area.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.