ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022
Synthetic MRI for Radiotherapy Planning for Brain and Prostate Cancers: Phantom Validation and Patient Evaluation.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quantitative evaluation of synthetic MRI for assessing disease activity in thyroid eye disease.European radiology experimental · 2026Article
- Delta Histogram Analysis of Synthetic MRI for Evaluating Grade and Cellular Proliferation of Meningioma.Radiology. Imaging cancer · 2026Article
- Clinical Application of MAGiC Method in Distinguishing Between Pituitary Adenoma and Rathke's Cleft Cyst.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Technical aspects and clinical applications of synthetic MRI: a scoping review.Diagnosis (Berlin, Germany) · 2025Article
- Technical Optimization of SyntheticMR for the Head and Neck on a 3T MR-Simulator and 1.5T MR-Linac: A Prospective R-IDEAL Stage 2a Technology Innovation Report.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Quantitative MRI to Characterize Hypoxic Tumors in Comparison to FMISO PET/CT for Radiotherapy in Oropharynx Cancers.Cancers · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: We aimed to evaluate the accuracy of Methods: The accuracy of Results: The phantom results showed good agreement (mean bias, 8.4%) between the two measurement methods for Conclusion: This study shows that the accuracy, reproducibility, and repeatability of the multispectral pulse sequence (MAGiC
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.