Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35515084›Full record

ArticleJornal vascular brasileiro2021

Initial experience with Duplex scan combined with contrast-enhanced ultrasound for follow-up of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

Carolina Brito Faustino, Carlos Ventura, Maria Fernanda Cassino Portugal, André Brunheroto, Marcelo Passos Teivelis, Nelson Wolosker

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Jornal vascular brasileiro, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Carolina Brito FaustinoHospital Israelita Albert Einstein - HIAE, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-4858-9796
Carlos VenturaHospital Israelita Albert Einstein - HIAE, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Maria Fernanda Cassino PortugalHospital Israelita Albert Einstein - HIAE, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0003-2487-3052
André BrunherotoHospital Israelita Albert Einstein - HIAE, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Marcelo Passos TeivelisHospital Israelita Albert Einstein - HIAE, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Nelson WoloskerHospital Israelita Albert Einstein - HIAE, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Microbubble contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is an accurate diagnostic method for follow-up after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) that has been well-established in international studies. However, there are no Brazilian studies that focus on this follow-up method. Objectives: The objective of this study was to report initial experience with CEUS at a tertiary hospital, comparing the findings of CEUS with those of conventional Doppler ultrasound (DUS), with the aim of determining whether addition of contrast to the standard ultrasonographic control protocol resulted in different findings. Methods: From 2015 to 2017, 21 patients in follow-up after EVAR underwent DUS followed by CEUS. The findings of these examinations were analyzed in terms of identification of complications and their capacity to identify the origin of endoleaks. Results: There was evidence of complications in 10 of the 21 cases examined: seven patients exhibited endoleaks (33.3%); two patients exhibited stenosis of a branch of the endograft (9.52%); and one patient exhibited a dissection involving the external iliac artery (4.76%). In the 21 patients assessed, combined use of both methods identified 10 cases of post-EVAR complications. In six of the seven cases of endoleaks (85.71%), use of the methods in combination was capable of identifying the origin of endoleakage. DUS alone failed to identify endoleaks in two cases (28.5%) and identified doubtful findings in another two cases (28.5%), in which diagnostic definition was achieved after employing CEUS. Conclusions: CEUS is a technique that is easy to perform and provides additional support for follow-up of infrarenal EVAR.

Indexed as

endoleaksEVARmicrobubblesultrasound

Identifiers

PMID35515084
PMCPMC9045535
OpenAlexW3210326737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.