Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35515082›Full record

ArticleDigital discovery2022

Explainable graph neural networks for organic cages.

Qi Yuan, Filip T Szczypiński, Kim E Jelfs

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital discovery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Qi YuanDepartment of Chemistry, Molecular Sciences Research Hub, White City Campus, Imperial College London Wood Lane London UK k.jelfs@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7675-2642
Filip T SzczypińskiDepartment of Chemistry, Molecular Sciences Research Hub, White City Campus, Imperial College London Wood Lane London UK k.jelfs@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3174-8532
Kim E JelfsDepartment of Chemistry, Molecular Sciences Research Hub, White City Campus, Imperial College London Wood Lane London UK k.jelfs@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7683-7630

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of accurate and explicable machine learning models to predict the properties of topologically complex systems is a challenge in materials science. Porous organic cages, a class of polycyclic molecular materials, have potential application in molecular separations, catalysis and encapsulation. For most applications of porous organic cages, having a permanent internal cavity in the absence of solvent, a property termed "shape persistence" is critical. Here, we report the development of Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) to predict the shape persistence of organic cages. Graph neural networks are a class of neural networks where the data, in our case that of organic cages, are represented by graphs. The performance of the GNN models was measured against a previously reported computational database of organic cages formed through a range of [4 + 6] reactions with a variety of reaction chemistries. The reported GNNs have an improved prediction accuracy and transferability compared to random forest predictions. Apart from the improvement in predictive power, we explored the explicability of the GNNs by computing the integrated gradient of the GNN input. The contribution of monomers and molecular fragments to the shape persistence of the organic cages could be quantitatively evaluated with integrated gradients. With the added explicability of the GNNs, it was possible not only to accurately predict the property of organic materials, but also to interpret the predictions of the deep learning models and provide structural insights for the discovery of future materials.

Identifiers

PMID35515082
PMCPMC8996732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.