ArticleDigital discovery2022
Explainable graph neural networks for organic cages.
Article in Digital discovery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cross-disciplinary perspectives on the potential for artificial intelligence across chemistry.Chemical Society reviews · 2025Review
- Article
- Beyond symmetric self-assembly and effective molarity: unlocking functional enzyme mimics with robust organic cages.Beilstein journal of organic chemistry · 2025Article
- Fine-tuning GPT-3 for machine learning electronic and functional properties of organic molecules.Chemical science · 2024Article
- Deep generative design of porous organic cagesDigital discovery · 2023Article
- Computational modeling to assist in the discovery of supramolecular materials.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2022Review
- Graph neural networks for materials science and chemistry.Communications materials · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The development of accurate and explicable machine learning models to predict the properties of topologically complex systems is a challenge in materials science. Porous organic cages, a class of polycyclic molecular materials, have potential application in molecular separations, catalysis and encapsulation. For most applications of porous organic cages, having a permanent internal cavity in the absence of solvent, a property termed "shape persistence" is critical. Here, we report the development of Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) to predict the shape persistence of organic cages. Graph neural networks are a class of neural networks where the data, in our case that of organic cages, are represented by graphs. The performance of the GNN models was measured against a previously reported computational database of organic cages formed through a range of [4 + 6] reactions with a variety of reaction chemistries. The reported GNNs have an improved prediction accuracy and transferability compared to random forest predictions. Apart from the improvement in predictive power, we explored the explicability of the GNNs by computing the integrated gradient of the GNN input. The contribution of monomers and molecular fragments to the shape persistence of the organic cages could be quantitatively evaluated with integrated gradients. With the added explicability of the GNNs, it was possible not only to accurately predict the property of organic materials, but also to interpret the predictions of the deep learning models and provide structural insights for the discovery of future materials.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.