Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35515079›Full record

ArticleResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2022

Anti-platelet factor 4 immunoglobulin G levels in vaccine-induced immune thrombocytopenia and thrombosis: Persistent positivity through 7 months.

Samantha J Montague, Christopher W Smith, Clare S Lodwick, Charlotte Stoneley, Matthew Roberts, Gillian C Lowe, William A Lester, Steve P Watson, Phillip L R Nicolson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia.Best practice & research. Clinical haematology · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Samantha J MontagueInstitute of Cardiovascular Sciences College of Medical and Dental Sciences University of Birmingham Birmingham UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8934-3901
Christopher W SmithInstitute of Cardiovascular Sciences College of Medical and Dental Sciences University of Birmingham Birmingham UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3381-2032
Clare S LodwickDepartment of Haematology Worcester Acute Hospitals NHS Trust Worcester UK.
Charlotte StoneleyDepartment of Blood Sciences University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust Birmingham UK.
Matthew RobertsDepartment of Blood Sciences University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust Birmingham UK.
Gillian C LoweComprehensive Care Haemophilia Centre University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust Birmingham UK.
William A LesterComprehensive Care Haemophilia Centre University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust Birmingham UK.
Steve P WatsonInstitute of Cardiovascular Sciences College of Medical and Dental Sciences University of Birmingham Birmingham UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7846-7423
Phillip L R NicolsonInstitute of Cardiovascular Sciences College of Medical and Dental Sciences University of Birmingham Birmingham UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4843-2975
University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GBWorcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation AA/18/2/34218British Heart Foundation CH/03/003/15571
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Anti-platelet factor 4 (PF4) antibodies that activate platelets via FcγRIIA drive the pathophysiology of vaccine-induced immune thrombocytopenia and thrombosis (VITT). Evolution of these antibodies and their ability to activate platelets after initial treatment remains unknown. Objectives: To assess how clinical and platelet parameters, anti-PF4 antibody levels, and patient serum reactivity changes during follow-up after VITT presentation. Methods: We describe cases of seven discharged VITT patients that were followed from diagnosis up to 280 days (range 199-280) after vaccination. We measured anti-PF4 antibodies and PF4 levels in patient serum during follow-up and tested the ability of patient serum to activate healthy donor platelets and patient platelets over time. Results: Anti-PF4 immunoglobulin G antibody levels are very high at diagnosis (0.9-2.6 OD) and remain relatively high (>1.0 OD) in all patients, except one treated with rituximab, at 7 months post vaccination. All patients were on direct oral anticoagulants throughout follow-up and no patients had recurrent thrombosis. Patients' platelets during follow-up have normal FcγRIIA levels and responsiveness to platelet agonists. Patient diagnostic serum strongly activated control platelets, either alone or with PF4. Most follow-up serum alone was weaker at stimulating donor and patient platelets. However, follow-up serum beyond 150 days still strongly activated platelets with PF4 addition in three patients. Patient serum PF4 levels were lower than controls at diagnosis but returned within normal range by day 50. Conclusions: Explanations for reduced platelet activation during follow-up, despite similar total anti-PF4 antibody levels, remains unclear. Clinical implications of persistent anti-PF4 antibodies in VITT require further study.

Indexed as

anti‐PF4 antibodiesAZD1222 vaccinationFcγRIIAthrombosisVITT

Identifiers

PMID35515079
PMCPMC9066380
OpenAlexW4229000850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.