ArticleRSC advances2020
Electron configuration-based neural network model to predict physicochemical properties of inorganic compounds.
Article in RSC advances, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quantitative structure-activity relationship model to predict the stability constant of uranium coordination complexes for novel uranium adsorbent design.RSC advances · 2025Article
- Topological Distance-Based Electron Interaction Tensor to Apply a Convolutional Neural Network on Drug-like Compounds.ACS omega · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Registration, evaluation, and authorization of chemicals (REACH), the regulation of chemicals in use, imposes the characterization and report of the physicochemical properties of compounds. To cope with the financial burden of the experiments, the use of computational models is permitted for prediction of properties. Although a number of physicochemical property prediction models have been developed, their applicability domain is limited to organic molecules since most available data are concerned with organic molecules, and most of the molecular descriptors are restricted to organic molecule calculations. Prediction models developed for inorganic compounds were intended to predict endpoints relevant to novel material design. Therefore, no models were available for predicting endpoints of inorganic compounds that are significant to regulatory perspectives. In this study, boiling point, water solubility, melting point, and pyrolysis point prediction models were developed for inorganic compounds based on their composition. The electron configuration of each element in the molecule was used as a descriptor in this study. The dataset covered a wide range of endpoints and diverse elements in their structure. The performance of the models was measured using
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.