Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35514947›Full record

ArticleBMJ simulation & technology enhanced learning2019

Virtual patient educational programme to teach counselling to clinical pharmacists: development and proof of concept.

Charlotte Lucy Richardson, Stephen Chapman, Simon White

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ simulation & technology enhanced learning, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Establishing the acceptability and usability of an animated virtual patient simulation.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2021
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Exploring the application of mixed reality in Nurse education.BMJ simulation & technology enhanced learning · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Charlotte Lucy RichardsonSchool of Pharmacy,, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2195-4279
Stephen ChapmanSchool of Pharmacy,, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK.
Simon WhiteSchool of Pharmacy,, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK.
Keele University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pharmacist-patient counselling can benefit patients and optimise care, but appropriate training is required. A virtual patient (VP) tool to teach pharmacists non-vitamin K oral anticoagulant counselling was developed; the VP may be used for continuing professional development. The objective was to develop and show proof of concept of the VP. A cyclic development approach was adopted whereby the client, developers and a steering group informed VP design, content and aesthetic. This included formal and informal evaluation; ethical approval was not required. The VP received varied feedback. Positive feedback concerned the technology and the high-standard of animations. Negative elements concerned international VP use and differences in practice, also technological comments, regarding VP delivery and usability on various electronic devices. The VP was reported to be 'valuable' and realistic with high-quality animations. The steering group commented on VP's clinical appropriateness, cultural relevance and usability. Areas highlighted for improvement were rectified during development, including the incorporation of printable feedback. European considerations concerned differences in culture and practice. The development process successfully developed the VP and the proof of the concept was demonstrated. This will inform future VP development; a large-scale VP evaluation is underway.

Indexed as

counsellingeducationpharmacistsimulationvirtual patient

Identifiers

PMID35514947
PMCPMC8936846
OpenAlexW2808309926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.