Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35514864›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference2021

From Reflection to Action: Combining Machine Learning with Expert Knowledge for Nutrition Goal Recommendations.

Elliot G Mitchell, Elizabeth M Heitkemper, Marissa Burgermaster, Matthew E Levine, Yishen Miao, Maria L Hwang, Pooja M Desai, Andrea Cassells, Jonathan N Tobin, Esteban G Tabak and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Informing the Design of Individualized Self-Management Regimens from the Human, Data, and Machine Learning Perspectives.ACM transactions on computer-human interaction : a publication of the Association for Computing Machinery · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Machine Learning in Nutrition Research.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2022
    Article
  11. Examining AI Methods for Micro-Coaching Dialogs.Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. T2 Coach: A Qualitative Study of an Automated Health Coach for Diabetes Self-Management.Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference
    Article
  14. Feasibility and Utility of Multimodal Micro Ecological Momentary Assessment on a Smartwatch.Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Elliot G MitchellDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University.
Elizabeth M HeitkemperSchool of Nursing, The University of Texas at Austin.
Marissa BurgermasterDepartment of Population Health, Dell Medical School, and Department of Nutritional Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin.
Matthew E LevineDepartment of Computing and Mathematical Sciences, California Institute of Technology.
Yishen MiaoDepartment of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of California Santa Barbara.
Maria L HwangScience and Math, Fashion Institute of Technology.
Pooja M DesaiDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University.
Andrea CassellsClinical Directors Network (CDN).
Jonathan N TobinClinical Directors Network (CDN) and The Rockefeller University.
Esteban G TabakCourant Institute of Mathematical Sciences.
David J AlbersUniversity of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Section of Informatics and Data Science, Departments of Pediatrics, Biomedical Engineering, and Biostatistics and Informatics, and Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University.
Arlene M SmaldoneSchool of Nursing, Columbia University.
Lena MamykinaDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University.
Columbia University · USClinical Directors Network · USThe University of Texas at Austin · USCalifornia Institute of Technology · USCourant Institute of Mathematical Sciences · USFashion Institute of Technology · USUniversity of California, Santa Barbara · US

Funding

Training in Biomedical Informatics at Columbia UniversityT15LM007079 · NLM · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI NOEMIE ELHADAD, GEORGE M HRIPCSAK · 1992 to 2026
$28.9M
Dynamically Tailoring Interventions for Problem-Solving in Diabetes Self-Management Using Self-Monitoring Data - a Randomized Controlled Trial.R01DK113189 · NIDDK · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI MAMYKINA, OLENA · 2019 to 2023
$3.3M
Dynamically Tailoring Interventions for Problem-Solving in Diabetes Self-Management Using Self-Monitoring Data - a Randomized Controlled TrialR56DK113189 · NIDDK · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI MAMYKINA, OLENA · 2017 to 2017
$176k
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK113189NIDDK NIH HHS R56 DK113189NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007079
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Self-tracking can help personalize self-management interventions for chronic conditions like type 2 diabetes (T2D), but reflecting on personal data requires motivation and literacy. Machine learning (ML) methods can identify patterns, but a key challenge is making actionable suggestions based on personal health data. We introduce GlucoGoalie, which combines ML with an expert system to translate ML output into personalized nutrition goal suggestions for individuals with T2D. In a controlled experiment, participants with T2D found that goal suggestions were understandable and actionable. A 4-week in-the-wild deployment study showed that receiving goal suggestions augmented participants' self-discovery, choosing goals highlighted the multifaceted nature of personal preferences, and the experience of following goals demonstrated the importance of feedback and context. However, we identified tensions between abstract goals and concrete eating experiences and found static text too ambiguous for complex concepts. We discuss implications for ML-based interventions and the need for systems that offer more interactivity, feedback, and negotiation.

Indexed as

Diabetes self-managementGoal settingMachine learningPersonal Informatics

Identifiers

PMID35514864
PMCPMC9067367
OpenAlexW3162674315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.