ArticlePulmonary circulation2022
Accuracy of Swan‒Ganz catheterization-based assessment of right ventricular function: Validation study using high-fidelity micromanometry-derived values as reference.
Article in Pulmonary circulation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Right Heart Diastology, Where Are We Now?Circulation research · 2026Review
- Right Ventricular Dysfunction in Lung Disease/Hypoxia-Associated Pulmonary Hypertension.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- Right Ventricular Pressure Waveform Analysis-Clinical Relevance and Future Directions.Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia · 2024Review
- A PrOsPective Cohort Study on Interstitial Lung Disease-Associated Pulmonary Hypertension with a ParticulaR Focus on the Subset with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Features (POPLAR Study).Pulmonary therapy · 2024Article
- Echocardiographic estimation of right ventricular diastolic stiffness based on pulmonary regurgitant velocity waveform analysis in precapillary pulmonary hypertension.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2024Article
- Exploratory analysis of the accuracy of echocardiographic parameters for the assessment of right ventricular function and right ventricular-pulmonary artery coupling.Pulmonary circulation · 2024Article
- Article
- Accuracy of Swan‒Ganz catheterization-based assessment of right ventricular function: Validation study using high-fidelity micromanometry-derived values as reference.Pulmonary circulation · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Right ventricular (RV) function critically affects the outcomes of patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH). Pressure wave analysis using Swan‒Ganz catheterization (SG-cath) allows for the calculation of indices of RV function. However, the accuracy of these indices has not been validated. In the present study, we calculated indices of systolic and diastolic RV functions using SG-cath-derived pressure recordings in patients with suspected or confirmed PH. We analyzed and validated the accuracies of three RV indices having proven prognostic values, that is, end-systolic elastance (Ees)/arterial elastance (Ea),
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.