ArticleJournal of oral biology and craniofacial research
Evaluation of microleakage for three types of light cure orthodontic band cement.
Article in Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of the Bond Strength of Primary Molar Bands to Zirconia and Stainless-Steel Crowns Following Sandblasting and Application of Different Cements.International journal of dentistry · 2026Article
- Influence of cement type on the bond strength of orthodontic bands to zirconia crowns.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Evaluation of the biological, physical, mechanical and chemical properties of orthodontic primer modified by nano-chitosan loaded with bioactive materials.Journal of oral biology and craniofacial researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the microleakage of three types of light cure orthodontic band cement (Resilience, Band-it and Transbond Plus) and to compare low and high curing light intensities at the enamel-cement and band-cement interfaces in the gingival and occlusal margins. Materials and methods: Sixty extracted human premolars were divided into six groups (n = 10 specimens) according to the type of cement used and intensity of light cure. Microetched bands of upper premolars cemented to the teeth by Transbond Plus (3 M Unitek), Resilience (Orthotechnology) and Band-it (db Orthodontics). Three groups were cured by a standard mode light cure (over 900 mw/cm Result: The microleakage scores showed no significant differences at the enamel-cement and band-cement interfaces among the three types of orthodontic band cement subjected to low- and high-intensity curing light. Conclusions: The type of cement and intensity of light cure did not affect the amount of microleakage at either interface.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.