Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35514535›Full record

ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering

Evaluating the impact of MR image harmonization on thalamus deep network segmentation.

Muhan Shao, Lianrui Zuo, Aaron Carass, Jiachen Zhuo, Rao P Gullapalli, Jerry L Prince

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Muhan ShaoDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
Lianrui ZuoDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
Aaron CarassDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
Jiachen ZhuoDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Rao P GullapalliDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Jerry L PrinceDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.

Funding

Longitudinal Sub-thalamic Structure and Functional Alterations in Mild Traumatic Brain InjuryR01NS105503 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI BADJATIA, NEERAJ, PRINCE, JERRY L · 2018 to 2022
$3.5M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS105503
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medical image segmentation is one of the core tasks of medical image analysis. Automatic segmentation of brain magnetic resonance images (MRIs) can be used to visualize and track changes of the brain's anatomical structures that may occur due to normal aging or disease. Machine learning techniques are widely used in automatic structure segmentation. However, the contrast variation between the training and testing data makes it difficult for segmentation algorithms to generate consistent results. To address this problem, an image-to-image translation technique called MR image harmonization can be used to match the contrast between different data sets. It is important for the harmonization to transform image intensity while maintaining the underlying anatomy. In this paper, we present a 3D U-Net algorithm to segment the thalamus from multiple MR image modalities and investigate the impact of harmonization on the segmentation algorithm. Manual delineations of thalamic nuclei on two data sets are available. However, we aim to analyze the thalamus in another large data set where ground truth labels are lacking. We trained two segmentation networks, one with unharmonized images and the other with harmonized images, on one data set with manual labels, and compared their performances on the other data set with manual labels. These two data groups were diagnosed with two brain disorders and were acquired with similar imaging protocols. The harmonization target is the large data set without manual labels, which also has a different imaging protocol. The networks trained on unharmonized and harmonized data showed no significant difference when evaluating on the other data set; demonstrating that image harmonization can maintain the anatomy and does not affect the segmentation task. The two networks were evaluated on the harmonization target data set and the network trained on harmonized data showed significant improvement over the network trained on unharmonized data. Therefore, the network trained on harmonized data provides the potential to process large amounts of data from other sites, even in the absence of site-specific training data.

Indexed as

harmonizationMRIsegmentationthalamus

Identifiers

PMID35514535
PMCPMC9070007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.