ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering
Evaluating the impact of MR image harmonization on thalamus deep network segmentation.
Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A roadmap towards standardized neuroimaging approaches for human thalamic nuclei.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2024Review
- Deep learning for the harmonization of structural MRI scans: a survey.Biomedical engineering online · 2024Review
- Image harmonization improves consistency of intra-rater delineations of MS lesions in heterogeneous MRI.Neuroimage. Reports · 2024Article
- Image harmonization: A review of statistical and deep learning methods for removing batch effects and evaluation metrics for effective harmonization.NeuroImage · 2023Review
- Trans-Synaptic Degeneration Following Acute Optic Neuritis in Multiple Sclerosis.Annals of neurology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Medical image segmentation is one of the core tasks of medical image analysis. Automatic segmentation of brain magnetic resonance images (MRIs) can be used to visualize and track changes of the brain's anatomical structures that may occur due to normal aging or disease. Machine learning techniques are widely used in automatic structure segmentation. However, the contrast variation between the training and testing data makes it difficult for segmentation algorithms to generate consistent results. To address this problem, an image-to-image translation technique called MR image harmonization can be used to match the contrast between different data sets. It is important for the harmonization to transform image intensity while maintaining the underlying anatomy. In this paper, we present a 3D U-Net algorithm to segment the thalamus from multiple MR image modalities and investigate the impact of harmonization on the segmentation algorithm. Manual delineations of thalamic nuclei on two data sets are available. However, we aim to analyze the thalamus in another large data set where ground truth labels are lacking. We trained two segmentation networks, one with unharmonized images and the other with harmonized images, on one data set with manual labels, and compared their performances on the other data set with manual labels. These two data groups were diagnosed with two brain disorders and were acquired with similar imaging protocols. The harmonization target is the large data set without manual labels, which also has a different imaging protocol. The networks trained on unharmonized and harmonized data showed no significant difference when evaluating on the other data set; demonstrating that image harmonization can maintain the anatomy and does not affect the segmentation task. The two networks were evaluated on the harmonization target data set and the network trained on harmonized data showed significant improvement over the network trained on unharmonized data. Therefore, the network trained on harmonized data provides the potential to process large amounts of data from other sites, even in the absence of site-specific training data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.