ArticleMaterials today. Bio2022
Bilateral double site (calvarial and mandibular) critical-size bone defect model in rabbits for evaluation of a craniofacial tissue engineering constructs.
Article in Materials today. Bio, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ultrasonic-driven force-electric nanodomains orchestrate lysosome-to-mitochondria functional cascade to accelerate bone regeneration.Bioactive materials · 2026Article
- The Regenerative Effect of Various Barrier Membranes With and Without Bone Grafting in Critical Size Defects in Rabbit Calvaria.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2026Article
- Vascularization and Bone Regeneration with 3D-Printed Composite Scaffolds in Rodent Critical-Size Calvarial Defects: Systematic Review.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Review
- Innovative animal models for surgical interventions and implant biocompatibility: a translational perspective.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Review
- Metal-phenolic network biointerface-mediated cell regulation for bone tissue regeneration.Materials today. Bio · 2025Review
- Personalized bioceramic grafts for craniomaxillofacial bone regeneration.International journal of oral science · 2024Review
- Critical-sized marginal defects around implants in the rabbit mandible.Oral and maxillofacial surgery · 2024Article
- Promotion of Bone Formation in a Rat Osteoporotic Vertebral Body Defect Model via Suppression of Osteoclastogenesis by Ectopic Embryonic Calvaria Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Developments in Alloplastic Bone Grafts and Barrier Membrane Biomaterials for Periodontal Guided Tissue and Bone Regeneration Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Functionalization of Ceramic Scaffolds with Exosomes from Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stromal Cells for Bone Tissue Engineering.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- In Vivo Evaluation of Regenerative Osteogenic Potential Using a Human Demineralized Dentin Matrix for Dental Application.Dentistry journal · 2024Article
- A novel micro-CT analysis for evaluating the regenerative potential of bone augmentation xenografts in rabbit calvarias.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Full-Field Strain Measurements of the Muscle-Tendon Junction Using X-ray Computed Tomography and Digital Volume Correlation.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Implants Placed with a Ring Technique Using Inlay and Onlay Block Xenografts in the Mandible of Rabbits.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Evaluation of the regenerative capacity of stem cells combined with bone graft material and collagen matrix using a rabbit calvarial defect model.Journal of periodontal & implant science · 2023Article
- Histological Comparison of Collagenated Cancellous Equine Bone Blocks Used as Inlay or Onlay for Lateral Bone Augmentation in Rabbits.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- A Comparative Study of HA/DBM Compounds Derived from Bovine and Porcine for Bone Regeneration.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2023Article
- Determination of critical-sized defect of mandible in a rabbit model: Micro-computed tomography, and histological evaluation.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Electrospun polycaprolactone incorporated with fluorapatite nanoparticles composite scaffolds enhance healing of experimental calvarial defect on rats.Annals of translational medicine · 2023Article
- Bone Grafts in Dental Medicine: An Overview of Autografts, Allografts and Synthetic Materials.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Most existing preclinical models for evaluating the biosafety and bone-regeneration efficacy of innovative bone substitute materials (BSMs) or tissue engineering (TE) constructs only consisted of a single-site defect and the anatomical locations of defect varied drastically. While the compelling evidence showed that the bone healing pattern is location-dependent, owing to developmental, structural, and functional differences of anatomical locations, this is particularly true for the craniofacial region. Taking this into account, the bone healing efficiency of a BSM shown at one anatomical defect location cannot ensure the same impact at another. This prompted us to develop, for the first time, a model of bilateral critical-sized defect (CSD) at two distinctly different locations (non-load-bearing parietal calvaria and load-bearing mandibular body) co-existing in one rabbit to reduce the number of animals needed and avoid the influence of interindividual variability and evaluation bias on comparisons. 24 healthy adult male New Zealand White rabbits were randomly assigned to a group, either control, autograft (considered the "gold standard") or a clinically relevant BSM (biphasic calcium phosphate granules) (BCPg, Mastergraft®, Medronics). The full-thickness cylindrical calvarial defect (ø10 mm) on frontoparietal region and mandibular composite defect (ø11 mm) on the body of the mandible were created bilaterally using low-speed drilling with saline irrigation. The defect on one side was filled with autograft debris or BCPg, and the other side was no graft (empty). Following the euthanasia of animals at the predetermined intervals (4w and 12w), the defect zones were examined macroscopically and then sampled and processed for microcomputed tomography (microCT) and histological analysis. All surgeries went uneventfully, and all rabbits recovered slowly but steadily. No symptoms of infection or inflammation associated with the defect were observed during the experiment. At 4w and 12w, macroscopic views of all defect sites were clean without any signs of necrosis or abscess, and no intraoral communication was found. The analysis of microCT and histological findings showed the non-healing nature of the empty defect, thereby both calvaria and mandible CSDs can be validated. The study of the application of BCPg in this defect model highlighted good osteointegration and excellent osteoconductive properties but compromised the osteoinductive properties of this material (compared with autograft). To conclude, this novel double-site CSD model holds great promise in the application for preclinical evaluation of BSMs, TE construct, etc. With a reduced number of animals in use, and lower interindividual variability and evaluation bias for comparisons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.