Trial reportThe clinical respiratory journal2022
Construction and validation of prognostic nomograms for elderly patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.
Trial report in The clinical respiratory journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Construction and validation of prognostic nomograms for elderly patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.The clinical respiratory journal · 2022Trial
- Development and internal validation of a prognostic model for cancer-specific survival in elderly patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: a SEER-based study.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Clinical overall survival prediction and disease characteristics of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: an integrated analysis based on the SEER and TCGA databases.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Prognostic Analysis of Lung Cancer With Brain Metastases in Elderly Patients: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.Aging medicine (Milton (N.S.W)) · 2025Article
- Nomogram predicting overall survival of stage IIIB non-small-cell lung cancer patients based on the SEER database.The clinical respiratory journal · 2025Article
- A nomogram to predict postoperative overall and cancer specific survival in patients with primary parotid squamous cell carcinoma: a population based study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Prognostic factors of survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a competing risk model using the SEER database.Translational cancer research · 2022Article
- A Population-Based Study on the Prognostic factors and Efficacy of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in the Postoperative Stage for Patients with Stage IIA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2022Article
- Development and Validation of Prognostic Nomograms for Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma With Brain Metastasis in Patients Aged 45 Years or Older: A Population-Based Study.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMetastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is mostly seen in older patients and is associated with poor prognosis. There is no reliable method to predict the prognosis of elderly patients (≥60 years old) with metastatic NSCLC. The aim of our study was to develop and validate nomograms which accurately predict survival in this group of patients.
methodsNSCLC patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2015 were all identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Nomograms were constructed by significant clinicopathological variables (p < 0.05) selected in multivariate Cox analysis regression.
resultsA total of 9584 patients met the inclusion criteria and were randomly allocated in the training (n = 6712) and validation (n = 2872) cohorts. In training cohort, independent prognostic factors included age, gender, race, grade, tumor site, pathology, T stage, N stage, radiotherapy, surgery, chemotherapy, and metastatic site (p < 0.05) for lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS) and overall survival (OS) were identified by the Cox regression. Nomograms for predicting 1-, 2-, and 3-years LCSS and OS were established and showed excellent predictive performance with a higher C-index than that of the 7th TNM staging system (LCSS: training cohort: 0.712 vs. 0.534; p < 0.001; validation cohort: 0.707 vs. 0.528; p < 0.001; OS: training cohort: 0.713 vs. 0.531; p < 0.001; validation cohort: 0.710 vs. 0.528; p < 0.001). The calibration plots showed good consistency from the predicted to actual survival probabilities both in training cohort and validation cohort. Moreover, the decision curve analysis (DCA) achieved better net clinical benefit compared with TNM staging models.
conclusionsWe established and validated novel nomograms for predicting LCSS and OS in elderly patients with metastatic NSCLC with desirable discrimination and calibration ability. These nomograms could provide personalized risk assessment for these patients and assist in clinical decision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.