Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35513813›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2022

Biomechanical properties of a suture anchor system from human allogenic mineralized cortical bone matrix for rotator cuff repair.

Jakob E Schanda, Barbara Obermayer-Pietsch, Gerhard Sommer, Philipp R Heuberer, Brenda Laky, Christian Muschitz, Klaus Pastl, Eva Pastl, Christian Fialka, Rainer Mittermayr and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Jakob E SchandaDepartment for Trauma Surgery, AUVA Trauma Center Vienna-Meidling, Vienna, Austria. jakob.schanda@gmail.com.
Barbara Obermayer-PietschDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Gerhard SommerInstitute of Biomechanics, Graz University of Technology, Graz, Austria.
Philipp R HeubererhealthPi Medical Center, Vienna, Austria.
Brenda LakyAustrian Research Group for Regenerative and Orthopedic Medicine (AURROM), Vienna, Austria.
Christian MuschitzII Medical Department, Vinforce, St. Vincent Hospital Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Klaus Pastlsurgebright GmbH, Lichtenberg, Austria.
Eva Pastlsurgebright GmbH, Lichtenberg, Austria.
Christian FialkaDepartment for Trauma Surgery, AUVA Trauma Center Vienna-Meidling, Vienna, Austria.
Rainer MittermayrDepartment for Trauma Surgery, AUVA Trauma Center Vienna-Meidling, Vienna, Austria.
Johannes GrillariLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Traumatology, The Research Center in Cooperation with AUVA, Vienna, Austria.
Ines FoesslMichael Ogon Laboratory for Orthopaedic Research, Vienna, Austria.
Austrian Cluster for Tissue Regeneration · ATUnfallkrankenhaus Meidling · ATGraz University of Technology · ATInstitute of Molecular Biotechnology · ATLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Digital Health and PreventionMedical University of Graz · ATVinforce · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSuture anchors (SAs) made of human allogenic mineralized cortical bone matrix are among the newest developments in orthopaedic and trauma surgery. Biomechanical properties of an allogenic mineralized suture anchor (AMSA) are not investigated until now. The primary objective was the biomechanical investigation of AMSA and comparing it to a metallic suture anchor (MSA) and a bioabsorbable suture anchor (BSA) placed at the greater tuberosity of the humeral head of cadaver humeri. Additionally, we assessed the biomechanical properties of the SAs with bone microarchitecture parameters.

methodsFirst, bone microarchitecture of 12 fresh frozen human cadaver humeri from six donors was analyzed by high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography. In total, 18 AMSAs, 9 MSAs, and 9 BSAs were implanted at a 60° angle. All three SA systems were systematically implanted alternating in three positions within the greater tuberosity (position 1: anterior, position 2: central, position 3: posterior) with a distance of 15 mm to each other. Biomechanical load to failure was measured in a uniaxial direction at 135°.

resultsMean age of all specimens was 53.6 ± 9.1 years. For all bone microarchitecture measurements, linear regression slope estimates were negative which implies decreasing values with increasing age of specimens. Positioning of all three SA systems at the greater tuberosity was equally distributed (p = 0.827). Mean load to failure rates were higher for AMSA compared to MSA and BSA without reaching statistical significance between the groups (p = 0.427). Anchor displacement was comparable for all three SA systems, while there were significant differences regarding failure mode between all three SA systems (p < 0.001). Maximum load to failure was reached in all cases for AMSA, in 44.4% for MSA, and in 55.6% for BSA. Suture tear was observed in 55.6% for MSA and in 22.2% for BSA. Anchor breakage was solely seen for BSA (22.2%). No correlations were observed between bone microarchitecture parameters and load to failure rates of all three suture anchor systems.

conclusionsThe AMSA showed promising biomechanical properties for initial fixation strength for RCR. Since reduced BMD is an important issue for patients with chronic rotator cuff lesions, the AMSA is an interesting alternative to MSA and BSA. Also, the AMSA could improve healing of the enthesis.

Indexed as

Rotator Cuff InjuriesSuture AnchorsAdultAmsacrineBiomechanical PhenomenaCadaverCortical BoneHumansMiddle AgedRotator CuffSuture TechniquesAmsacrineAllogenic mineralized suture anchorBiomechanical analysisHigh-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomographyRotator cuff reconstructionShoulderShoulder surgerySuture anchor

Identifiers

PMID35513813
PMCPMC9069722
OpenAlexW4229015572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.