Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35513745›Full record

ArticleAnimal cognition2022

Individual recognition and long-term memory of inanimate interactive agents and humans in dogs.

Judit Abdai, Dalma Bartus, Sylvain Kraus, Zsuzsanna Gedai, Beatrix Laczi, Ádám Miklósi

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal cognition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Judit AbdaiMTA-ELTE Comparative Ethology Research Group, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1219-2858
Dalma BartusUniversity of Veterinary Medicine, Budapest, Hungary.
Sylvain KrausParis 13 University, Paris, France.
Zsuzsanna GedaiDepartment of Ethology, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.
Beatrix LacziDepartment of Ethology, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.
Ádám MiklósiMTA-ELTE Comparative Ethology Research Group, Budapest, Hungary. adam.miklosi@ttk.elte.hu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4831-8985
Eötvös Loránd University · HUUniversité Sorbonne Paris Nord · FRUniversity of Veterinary Medicine · HU

Funding

Nemzeti Kutatási Fejlesztési és Innovációs Hivatal TKP2020- IKA-05Office for Supported Research Groups MTA 01 031
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Investigation of individual recognition (IR) is difficult due to the lack of proper control of cues and previous experiences of subjects. Utilization of artificial agents (Unidentified Moving Objects: UMOs) may offer a better approach than using conspecifics or humans as partners. In Experiment 1, we investigated whether dogs are able to develop IR of UMOs (that is stable for at least 24 h) or that they only retain a more generalised memory about them. The UMO helped dogs to obtain an unreachable ball and played with them. One day, one week or one month later, we tested whether dogs display specific behaviour toward the familiar UMO over unfamiliar ones (four-way choice test). Dogs were also re-tested in the same helping context and playing interaction. Subjects did not approach the familiar UMO sooner than the others; however, they gazed at the familiar UMO earlier during re-testing of the problem solving task, irrespectively of the delay. In Experiment 2, we repeated the same procedure with human partners, applying a two-way choice test after a week delay, to study whether lack of IR was specific to the UMO. Dogs did not approach the familiar human sooner than the unfamiliar, but they gazed at the familiar partner earlier during re-testing. Thus, dogs do not seem to recognise an individual UMO or human after a short experience, but they remember the interaction with the novel partner in general, even after a long delay. We suggest that dogs need more experience with a specific social partner for the development of long-term memory.

Indexed as

CuesRecognition, PsychologyAnimalsDogsHumansMemory, Long-TermProblem SolvingAnimal-robot interactionDogIndividual recognitionMemoryRobot

Identifiers

PMID35513745
PMCPMC9652224
OpenAlexW4229054449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.