Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35513737›Full record

ReviewNeurosurgical review2022

Cerebrospinal fluid hydrocephalus shunting: cisterna magna, ventricular frontal, ventricular occipital.

Seifollah Gholampour, Jay Patel, Bakhtiar Yamini, David Frim

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Neurosurgical review, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Mechanisms of hydrocephalus after intraventricular haemorrhage: a review.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2024
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Seifollah GholampourDepartment of Neurological Surgery, The University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Ave, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
Jay PatelPritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Bakhtiar YaminiDepartment of Neurological Surgery, The University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Ave, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
David FrimDepartment of Neurological Surgery, The University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Ave, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA. dfrim@bsd.uchicago.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7219-2249
University of Chicago · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite advances in cerebrospinal fluid shunting technology, complications remain a significant concern. There are some contradictions about the effectiveness of proximal catheter entry sites that decrease shunt failures. We aim to compare efficiency of shunts with ventricular frontal, ventricular occipital, and cisterna magna entry sites. The systemic search was conducted in the database from conception to February 16, 2022 following guidelines of PRISMA. Between 2860 identified articles, 24 articles including 6094 patients were used for data synthesis. The aggregated results of all patients showed that "overall shunt failure rate per year" in mixed hydrocephalus with ventricular frontal and occipital shunts, and cisterna magna shunt (CMS) were 9.0%, 12.6%, and 30.7%, respectively. The corresponding values for "shunt failure rate" due to obstruction were 15.3%, 31.5%, and 10.2%, respectively. The similar results for "shunt failure rate" due to infection were 11.3%, 9.1%, and 27.2%, respectively. The related values for "shunt failure rate" due to overdrainage were 2.9%, 3.9%, and 13.6%, respectively. CMS was successful in the immediate resolution of clinical symptoms. Shunting through an occipital entry site had a greater likelihood of inaccurate catheter placement and location. Contrary to possible shunt failure due to overdrainage, the failure likelihood due to obstruction and infection in pediatric patients was higher than that of mixed hydrocephalus patients. In both mixed and pediatric hydrocephalus, obstruction and overdrainage were the most and least common complications of ventricular frontal and occipital shunts, respectively. The most and least common complications of mixed CMS were infection and obstruction, respectively.

Indexed as

Cisterna MagnaHydrocephalusCerebrospinal Fluid ShuntsChildEquipment FailureHumansNeurosurgical ProceduresCatheter entry siteCisterna magnaFrontal and occipitalHydrocephalusShunt failure rateShunt revision

Identifiers

PMID35513737
OpenAlexW4229056564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.