Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35513592›Full record

ArticleMicrobial ecology2023

Temporal Changes in Gut Microbiota Composition and Pollen Diet Associated with Colony Weakness of a Stingless Bee.

Karen Luisa Haag, Lílian Caesar, Marcos da Silveira Regueira-Neto, Dayana Rosalina de Sousa, Victor Montenegro Marcelino, Valdir de Queiroz Balbino, Airton Torres Carvalho

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial ecology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Gut microbiota of BrazilianbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Distinct fungal microbiomes of two Thai commercial stingless bee species,Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Karen Luisa HaagDepartment of Genetics and Program of Post Graduation in Genetics and Molecular Biology, Federal University of Rio Grande Do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil. karen.haag@ufrgs.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1162-0152
Lílian CaesarDepartment of Genetics and Program of Post Graduation in Genetics and Molecular Biology, Federal University of Rio Grande Do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9527-9125
Marcos da Silveira Regueira-NetoDepartment of Genetics, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2603-2716
Dayana Rosalina de SousaDepartment of Agronomy and Program of Post Graduation in Entomology, Federal Rural University of Pernambuco, Recife, PA, Brazil.
Victor Montenegro MarcelinoDepartment of Genetics and Program of Post Graduation in Genetics and Molecular Biology, Federal University of Rio Grande Do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Valdir de Queiroz BalbinoDepartment of Genetics, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4319-3952
Airton Torres CarvalhoDepartment of Biosciences, Center of Biological and Health Sciences, Federal Rural University of the Semi-Arid, Mossoró, RN, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3395-4444
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul · BRUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco · BRUniversidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco · BRUniversidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido · BR

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico Associação ABELHA #400597/2018-7Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico PQ #302121/2017-0Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul PQG 19/2551-0001860-6
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Compared to honeybees and bumblebees, the effect of diet on the gut microbiome of Neotropical corbiculate bees such as Melipona spp. is largely unknown. These bees have been managed for centuries, but recently an annual disease is affecting M. quadrifasciata, an endangered species kept exclusively by management in Southern Brazil. Here we report the results of a longitudinal metabarcoding study involving the period of M. quadrifasciata colony weakness, designed to monitor the gut microbiota and diet changes preceding an outbreak. We found increasing amounts of bacteria associated to the gut of forager bees 2 months before the first symptoms have been recorded. Simultaneously, forager bees showed decreasing body weight. The accelerated growth of gut-associated bacteria was uneven among taxa, with Bifidobacteriaceae dominating, and Lactobacillaceae decreasing in relative abundance within the bacterial community. Dominant fungi such as Candida and Starmerella also decreased in numbers, and the stingless bee obligate symbiont Zygosaccharomyces showed the lowest relative abundance during the outbreak period. Such changes were associated with pronounced diet shifts, i.e., the rise of Eucalyptus spp. pollen amount in forager bees' guts. Furthermore, there was a negative correlation between the amount of Eucalyptus pollen in diets and the abundance of some bacterial taxa in the gut-associated microbiota. We conclude that diet and subsequent interactions with the gut microbiome are key environmental components of the annual disease and propose the use of diet supplementation as means to sustain the activity of stingless bee keeping as well as native bee pollination services.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimalsBacteriaBeesDietPollenPollinationBee dietDiseaseGut microbiotaMeliponaStingless bee

Identifiers

PMID35513592
OpenAlexW4229035090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.