Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35513577›Full record

ArticleNature ecology & evolution2022

Genome-wide analyses of introgression between two sympatric Asian oak species.

Ruirui Fu, Yuxiang Zhu, Ying Liu, Yu Feng, Rui-Sen Lu, Yao Li, Pan Li, Antoine Kremer, Martin Lascoux, Jun Chen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature ecology & evolution, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
22.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Evolution of genome-wide barriers to gene flow during complex speciation in rattlesnakes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Spatiotemporal genomic patterns ofForestry research · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Ruirui FuCollege of Life Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Yuxiang ZhuCollege of Life Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3997-8327
Ying LiuCollege of Life Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Yu FengCollege of Life Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Rui-Sen LuCollege of Life Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Yao LiKey Laboratory of State Forestry and Grassland Administration on Subtropical Forest Biodiversity Conservation, College of Biology and the Environment, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8081-3703
Pan LiCollege of Life Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9407-7740
Antoine KremerUMR BIOGECO, INRAE, Université de Bordeaux, Cestas, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3372-3235
Martin LascouxProgram in Plant Ecology and Evolution, Department of Ecology and Genetics, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1699-9042
Jun ChenCollege of Life Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China. cjevol@zju.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3187-7668
Zhejiang University · CNChinese Academy of Sciences · CNCEA CESTA · FRNanjing Forestry University · CNUppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introgression can be an important source of new alleles for adaption under rapidly changing environments, perhaps even more important than standing variation. Though introgression has been extensively studied in many plants and animals, key questions on the underlying mechanisms of introgression still remain unanswered. In particular, we are yet to determine the genomic distribution of introgressed regions along the genome; whether the extent and patterns of introgression are influenced by ecological factors; and when and how introgression contributes to adaptation. Here, we generated high-quality genomic resources for two sympatric widespread Asian oak species, Quercus acutissima and Q. variabilis, sampled in multiple forests to study introgression between them. We show that introgressed regions are broadly distributed across the genome. Introgression was affected by genetic divergence between pairs of populations and by the similarity of the environments in which they live-populations occupying similar ecological sites tended to share the same introgressed regions. Introgressed genomic footprints of adaptation were preferentially located in regions with suppressed recombination rate. Introgression probably confers adaptation in these oak populations by introducing allelic variation in cis-regulatory elements, in particular through transposable element insertions, thereby altering the regulation of genes related to stress. Our results provide new avenues of research for uncovering mechanisms of adaptation due to hybridization in sympatric species.

Indexed as

QuercusSympatryAnimalsGenomeGenome-Wide Association StudyHybridization, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID35513577
OpenAlexW4229027809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.