ArticleNPJ digital medicine2022
Evaluation of an artificial intelligence-based medical device for diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
60 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Early Identification of Autism Using Cry Analysis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Retrospective and Prospective Studies.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence for tracking social behaviours and supporting an autism spectrum disorder diagnosis: systematic review and meta-analysis.EBioMedicine · 2025Pooled it
- Early diagnostic value of home video-based machine learning in autism spectrum disorder: a meta-analysis.European journal of pediatrics · 2024Pooled it
- Physical therapy using digital therapeutics in infants with congenital muscular torticollis: a pilot study.Scientific reports · 2026Trial
- Skeleton-Based Activity Recognition for Children with Autism Using Graph Convolutional Networks.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Ethical and Governance Challenges of AI in Medical Imaging and Diagnostics: A Systematic Survey and Policy Framework Recommendations.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Pediatric Autism Diagnosis Accuracy and Confidence: A Comparison of Experienced and Inexperienced Clinicians Making Decisions with and without AI Decision Support.Research square · 2026Article
- Child and adolescent psychiatry: challenges, solutions, opportunities, and future directions.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2026Article
- Digital Mental Health: A Narrative Review of FDA-Authorized Products for Psychiatric Treatment and Diagnostic Support.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- A contrastive reconstruction vision transformer model for intelligent diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Six artificial intelligence innovation strategies applied to autism spectrum disorder research: A narrative review.Pediatric investigation · 2026Review
- The Digital Diagnostic Odyssey: Artificial Intelligence and Social Media Crowdsourcing Amid Pediatric Neurology Access Gaps.Annals of the Child Neurology Society · 2026Article
- A naturalistic, non-invasive method for capturing biometric data during autism evaluations.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Artificial-intelligence-based developmental screening for pre-school children (ages 3-6): a scoping review of deployed tools, clinical validity, equity, and implementation in guidance-center settings.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Review
- AI-supported early autism identification as public health infrastructure: economic implications for the United States using a scenario-based economic model.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- AI-Enabled Technologies and Biomarker Analysis for the Early Identification of Autism and Related Neurodevelopmental Disorders.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- The evolving role of machine learning in autism spectrum disorder: current evidence and future directions.Pediatric research · 2025Review
- The role of machine learning in autism spectrum disorder assessment and management.Pediatric research · 2025Review
- A Brief Observation to Screen Autism in Toddlers and Predict Developmental Trajectory.Journal of pediatrics. Clinical practice · 2025Article
- Compact subsets of autism screening items predict clinical diagnoses with a machine learning analysis of the QCHAT-10.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) can be reliably diagnosed at 18 months, yet significant diagnostic delays persist in the United States. This double-blinded, multi-site, prospective, active comparator cohort study tested the accuracy of an artificial intelligence-based Software as a Medical Device designed to aid primary care healthcare providers (HCPs) in diagnosing ASD. The Device combines behavioral features from three distinct inputs (a caregiver questionnaire, analysis of two short home videos, and an HCP questionnaire) in a gradient boosted decision tree machine learning algorithm to produce either an ASD positive, ASD negative, or indeterminate output. This study compared Device outputs to diagnostic agreement by two or more independent specialists in a cohort of 18-72-month-olds with developmental delay concerns (425 study completers, 36% female, 29% ASD prevalence). Device output PPV for all study completers was 80.8% (95% confidence intervals (CI), 70.3%-88.8%) and NPV was 98.3% (90.6%-100%). For the 31.8% of participants who received a determinate output (ASD positive or negative) Device sensitivity was 98.4% (91.6%-100%) and specificity was 78.9% (67.6%-87.7%). The Device's indeterminate output acts as a risk control measure when inputs are insufficiently granular to make a determinate recommendation with confidence. If this risk control measure were removed, the sensitivity for all study completers would fall to 51.6% (63/122) (95% CI 42.4%, 60.8%), and specificity would fall to 18.5% (56/303) (95% CI 14.3%, 23.3%). Among participants for whom the Device abstained from providing a result, specialists identified that 91% had one or more complex neurodevelopmental disorders. No significant differences in Device performance were found across participants' sex, race/ethnicity, income, or education level. For nearly a third of this primary care sample, the Device enabled timely diagnostic evaluation with a high degree of accuracy. The Device shows promise to significantly increase the number of children able to be diagnosed with ASD in a primary care setting, potentially facilitating earlier intervention and more efficient use of specialist resources.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.