Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35513550›Full record

ArticleNPJ digital medicine2022

Evaluation of an artificial intelligence-based medical device for diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder.

Jonathan T Megerian, Sangeeta Dey, Raun D Melmed, Daniel L Coury, Marc Lerner, Christopher J Nicholls, Kristin Sohl, Rambod Rouhbakhsh, Anandhi Narasimhan, Jonathan Romain and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Child and adolescent psychiatry: challenges, solutions, opportunities, and future directions.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Jonathan T MegerianCHOC Children's, Orange, CA, USA.
Sangeeta DeyBay Area Neuropsychological and Developmental Services, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Raun D MelmedMelmed Center, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.
Daniel L CouryNationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA.
Marc LernerCHOC Children's, Orange, CA, USA.
Christopher J NichollsThe Nicholls Group, Scottdale, AZ, USA.
Kristin SohlUniversity of Missouri, School of Medicine, Columbia, MO, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0588-8742
Rambod RouhbakhshForrest General Hospital, Family Medicine Residency Program, Hattiesburg, MS, USA.
Anandhi NarasimhanPrivate Practice, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Jonathan RomainCHOC Children's, Orange, CA, USA.
Sailaja GollaTexas Institute for Neurological Disorders, Frisco, TX, USA.
Safiullah ShareefTexas Child Neurology, Plano, TX, USA.
Andrey OstrovskySocial Innovation Ventures, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1677-2158
Jennifer ShannonCognoa Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Colleen KraftCognoa Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Stuart Liu-MayoCognoa Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Halim AbbasCognoa Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8394-1505
Diana E Gal-SzaboCognoa Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Dennis P WallCognoa Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Sharief TaramanCHOC Children's, Orange, CA, USA. sharief@cognoa.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2108-2490

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) can be reliably diagnosed at 18 months, yet significant diagnostic delays persist in the United States. This double-blinded, multi-site, prospective, active comparator cohort study tested the accuracy of an artificial intelligence-based Software as a Medical Device designed to aid primary care healthcare providers (HCPs) in diagnosing ASD. The Device combines behavioral features from three distinct inputs (a caregiver questionnaire, analysis of two short home videos, and an HCP questionnaire) in a gradient boosted decision tree machine learning algorithm to produce either an ASD positive, ASD negative, or indeterminate output. This study compared Device outputs to diagnostic agreement by two or more independent specialists in a cohort of 18-72-month-olds with developmental delay concerns (425 study completers, 36% female, 29% ASD prevalence). Device output PPV for all study completers was 80.8% (95% confidence intervals (CI), 70.3%-88.8%) and NPV was 98.3% (90.6%-100%). For the 31.8% of participants who received a determinate output (ASD positive or negative) Device sensitivity was 98.4% (91.6%-100%) and specificity was 78.9% (67.6%-87.7%). The Device's indeterminate output acts as a risk control measure when inputs are insufficiently granular to make a determinate recommendation with confidence. If this risk control measure were removed, the sensitivity for all study completers would fall to 51.6% (63/122) (95% CI 42.4%, 60.8%), and specificity would fall to 18.5% (56/303) (95% CI 14.3%, 23.3%). Among participants for whom the Device abstained from providing a result, specialists identified that 91% had one or more complex neurodevelopmental disorders. No significant differences in Device performance were found across participants' sex, race/ethnicity, income, or education level. For nearly a third of this primary care sample, the Device enabled timely diagnostic evaluation with a high degree of accuracy. The Device shows promise to significantly increase the number of children able to be diagnosed with ASD in a primary care setting, potentially facilitating earlier intervention and more efficient use of specialist resources.

Identifiers

PMID35513550
PMCPMC9072329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.