ArticleScientific reports2022
Fluorescence and UV/visible spectroscopic investigation of orange and mango fruit juice quality in case of Adama Town.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Amorphous selenium nanoparticles: synthesis strategies and multifunctional applications.RSC advances · 2026Review
- Optical Biosensors-Principles of Operation and Applications.Micromachines · 2026Review
- Catalytic reduction/degradation of methyl orange by metal nanoparticle containing systems: a critical review.RSC advances · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Extracted Mango and Orange juices were investigated by using spectroscopic techniques such as UV/Visible and Fluorescence. Three portions of samples (fresh juice) were stored at 22 °C for eight days, stored in a water bath and heated at 40 °C, 60 °C, and 80 °C for ten minutes. The highest wavelengths (455 nm) were observed from the UV/Vis results for fresh Mango juices, while 270 nm and 460 nm were observed for stored Mango juices. Furthermore, wavelengths of 320 nm were observed in heat-treated mango juice (40 °C). No absorption peaks were observed at 60 °C and 80 °C due to temperature effects. Absorption peaks of fresh fruit were observed at 330 nm and 390 nm, while 260 nm and 320 nm reflect stored orange juices absorptions peaks. From heat-treated stored (40 °C and 60 °C) samples, 320 nm and 260 nm absorption peaks were observed, respectively. Wavelength observed (454 nm, 540 nm & 700 nm) peaks represent the fresh mango juice spectra, while 460 nm and 700 nm are for stored Mango juices. The peaks observed in the region of 400-500 nm and at 700 nm represent heat-treated mango juices at 40 °C. Heat stored Mango juices (60 °C & 80 °C) have peaks at 700 nm. Peaks observed at 700 nm, 500 nm, and 455 nm reflect fresh orange juice, while 460-500 nm and 700 nm represent the emission spectra of the samples. The stored orange juice peaks at 460-500 nm and at 700 nm, but heated-stored orange juice peaks only at 700 nm. The pH values for orange and mango juices were 3.52-3.73 and 4.02-4.72, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.