Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35513481›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Excretion and viability of SARS-CoV-2 in feces and its association with the clinical outcome of COVID-19.

Cristina Cerrada-Romero, Judith Berastegui-Cabrera, Pedro Camacho-Martínez, Josune Goikoetxea-Aguirre, Patricia Pérez-Palacios, Sonia Santibáñez, María José Blanco-Vidal, Adoración Valiente, Jorge Alba, Regino Rodríguez-Álvarez and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Applied and environmental microbiology · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Cristina Cerrada-RomeroUnit of Infectious Diseases, Microbiology, and Preventive Medicine, Virgen del Rocío University Hospital, Seville, Spain.
Judith Berastegui-CabreraUnit of Infectious Diseases, Microbiology, and Preventive Medicine, Virgen del Rocío University Hospital, Seville, Spain.
Pedro Camacho-MartínezUnit of Infectious Diseases, Microbiology, and Preventive Medicine, Virgen del Rocío University Hospital, Seville, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6331-4600
Josune Goikoetxea-AguirreDepartament of Infectious Diseases, Cruces University Hospital, Bizkaia, Spain.
Patricia Pérez-PalaciosUnit of Infectious Diseases, Microbiology, and Preventive Medicine, Virgen Macarena University Hospital, Seville, Spain.
Sonia SantibáñezDepartment of Infectious Diseases, San Pedro University Hospital-CIBIR, Logroño, La Rioja, Spain.
María José Blanco-VidalDepartament of Infectious Diseases, Cruces University Hospital, Bizkaia, Spain.
Adoración ValienteUnit of Infectious Diseases, Microbiology, and Preventive Medicine, Virgen Macarena University Hospital, Seville, Spain.
Jorge AlbaDepartment of Infectious Diseases, San Pedro University Hospital-CIBIR, Logroño, La Rioja, Spain.
Regino Rodríguez-ÁlvarezDepartament of Infectious Diseases, Cruces University Hospital, Bizkaia, Spain.
Álvaro PascualInstitute of Biomedicine of Seville (IBiS), Virgen del Rocío and Virgen Macarena University Hospitals/CSIC/University of Seville, Seville, Spain.
José Antonio OteoDepartment of Infectious Diseases, San Pedro University Hospital-CIBIR, Logroño, La Rioja, Spain.
José Miguel CisnerosUnit of Infectious Diseases, Microbiology, and Preventive Medicine, Virgen del Rocío University Hospital, Seville, Spain.
Jerónimo PachónInstitute of Biomedicine of Seville (IBiS), Virgen del Rocío and Virgen Macarena University Hospitals/CSIC/University of Seville, Seville, Spain.
Inmaculada Casas-FlechaFlu and Respiratory Virus Unit, National Centre of Microbiology, Institute of Health Carlos III (ISCIII), Ctra. Majadahonda a Pozuelo, Km. 2, 28220, Madrid, Spain.
Elisa CorderoUnit of Infectious Diseases, Microbiology, and Preventive Medicine, Virgen del Rocío University Hospital, Seville, Spain.
Francisco PozoFlu and Respiratory Virus Unit, National Centre of Microbiology, Institute of Health Carlos III (ISCIII), Ctra. Majadahonda a Pozuelo, Km. 2, 28220, Madrid, Spain. pacopozo@isciii.es.
Javier Sánchez-CéspedesUnit of Infectious Diseases, Microbiology, and Preventive Medicine, Virgen del Rocío University Hospital, Seville, Spain. jsanchez-ibis@us.es.ORCID 0000-0003-2707-1979
Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla · ESHospital de Cruces · ESHospital San Pedro · ESInstituto de Salud Carlos III · ESHospital Universitario Virgen Macarena · ESHospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The main objective was to evaluate the viability of the SARS-CoV-2 viral particles excreted in stools. In addition, we aimed to identify clinical factors associated with the detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in feces, and to determine if its presence is associated with an unfavorable clinical outcome, defined as intensive care unit (ICU) admission and/or death. A prospective multicenter cohort study of COVID-19 adult patients, with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection by RT-PCR assay in nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs admitted to four hospitals in Spain, from March 2020 to February 2021. Sixty-two adult COVID-19 patients had stool samples collected at admission and/or during the follow up, with a total of 79 stool samples. SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected in stool samples from 27 (43.5%) out of the 62 patients. Replicative virus, measured by the generation of cytopathic effect in cell culture and subsequent RT-PCR confirmation of a decrease in the Ct values, was not found in any of these stool samples. Fecal virus excretion was not associated with the presence of gastrointestinal symptoms, or with differences in the evolution of COVID-19 patients. Our results suggest that SARS-CoV-2 replicative capacity is null or very limited in stool samples, and thus, the fecal-oral transmission of SARS-CoV-2 as an alternative infection route is highly unlikely. In our study, the detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in feces at the beginning of the disease is not associated with any clinical factor nor with an unfavorable clinical outcome.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2AdultCohort StudiesFecesHumansProspective StudiesRNA, ViralRNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID35513481
PMCPMC9070969
OpenAlexW4229012171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.