Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35513387›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

SPIN enables high throughput species identification of archaeological bone by proteomics.

Patrick Leopold Rüther, Immanuel Mirnes Husic, Pernille Bangsgaard, Kristian Murphy Gregersen, Pernille Pantmann, Milena Carvalho, Ricardo Miguel Godinho, Lukas Friedl, João Cascalheira, Alberto John Taurozzi and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
13.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A Beginner's Guide for Using Bone in Marine Mammal Research.Integrative and comparative biology · 2026
    Guideline
  2. Palaeoproteomic Deconvolution of Physical and Genetic Collagen Mixtures.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Patrick Leopold RütherNovo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. patrick.ruether@palaeome.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4461-9828
Immanuel Mirnes HusicNovo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Pernille BangsgaardGlobe institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Kristian Murphy GregersenInstitute of Conservation, Royal Danish Academy, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Pernille PantmannDept. of Archaeology, Museum Nordsjælland, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Milena CarvalhoInterdisciplinary Center of Archaeology and Evolution of Human Behavior, University of Algarve, Faro, Portugal.
Ricardo Miguel GodinhoInterdisciplinary Center of Archaeology and Evolution of Human Behavior, University of Algarve, Faro, Portugal.
Lukas FriedlInterdisciplinary Center of Archaeology and Evolution of Human Behavior, University of Algarve, Faro, Portugal.
João CascalheiraInterdisciplinary Center of Archaeology and Evolution of Human Behavior, University of Algarve, Faro, Portugal.
Alberto John TaurozziGlobe institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0378-1626
Marie Louise Schjellerup JørkovThe Laboratory of Biological Anthropology, Department of Forensic Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Michael M BenedettiInterdisciplinary Center of Archaeology and Evolution of Human Behavior, University of Algarve, Faro, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2900-887X
Jonathan HawsInterdisciplinary Center of Archaeology and Evolution of Human Behavior, University of Algarve, Faro, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2047-4524
Nuno BichoInterdisciplinary Center of Archaeology and Evolution of Human Behavior, University of Algarve, Faro, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9655-0549
Frido WelkerGlobe institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Enrico CappelliniGlobe institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7885-7811
Jesper Velgaard OlsenNovo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. jesper.olsen@cpr.ku.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4747-4938
University of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of Algarve · PTMoesgaard Museum · DKSchools of Visual Arts, The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts · DKUniversity of Louisville · USUniversity of New Mexico · USUniversity of North Carolina Wilmington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Species determination based on genetic evidence is an indispensable tool in archaeology, forensics, ecology, and food authentication. Most available analytical approaches involve compromises with regard to the number of detectable species, high cost due to low throughput, or a labor-intensive manual process. Here, we introduce "Species by Proteome INvestigation" (SPIN), a shotgun proteomics workflow for analyzing archaeological bone capable of querying over 150 mammalian species by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Rapid peptide chromatography and data-independent acquisition (DIA) with throughput of 200 samples per day reduce expensive MS time, whereas streamlined sample preparation and automated data interpretation save labor costs. We confirm the successful classification of known reference bones, including domestic species and great apes, beyond the taxonomic resolution of the conventional peptide mass fingerprinting (PMF)-based Zooarchaeology by Mass Spectrometry (ZooMS) method. In a blinded study of degraded Iron-Age material from Scandinavia, SPIN produces reproducible results between replicates, which are consistent with morphological analysis. Finally, we demonstrate the high throughput capabilities of the method in a high-degradation context by analyzing more than two hundred Middle and Upper Palaeolithic bones from Southern European sites with late Neanderthal occupation. While this initial study is focused on modern and archaeological mammalian bone, SPIN will be open and expandable to other biological tissues and taxa.

Indexed as

ProteomeProteomicsAnimalsArchaeologyChromatography, LiquidMammalsPeptidesTandem Mass SpectrometryPeptidesProteome

Identifiers

PMID35513387
PMCPMC9072323
OpenAlexW4229022310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.