Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35513055›Full record

ArticleThe Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases

Acceptability of self-sampling for etiological diagnosis of mucosal sexually transmitted infections (STIs) among transgender women in a longitudinal cohort study in São Paulo, Brazil.

Daniel Jason McCartney, Thiago Félix Pinheiro, José Luis Gomez, Paula Galdino Cardin de Carvalho, Maria Amélia Veras, Philippe Mayaud

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Daniel Jason McCartneyLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, United Kingdom. Electronic address: daniel.mccartney@lshtm.ac.uk.
Thiago Félix PinheiroFaculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
José Luis GomezFaculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Paula Galdino Cardin de CarvalhoFaculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Maria Amélia VerasFaculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Philippe MayaudLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, United Kingdom.
Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo · BRLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBUniversity of London · GB

Funding

The Transnational Cohort: global HIV epidemiology and prevention research for transwomen.R01MD010678 · NIMHD · PUBLIC HEALTH FOUNDATION ENTERPRISES · PI MCFARLAND, WILLIAM, MEEK, ERIN CATHERINE · 2015 to 2019
$2.4M
NIMHD NIH HHS R01 MD010678
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study conducted among transgender women in São Paulo, Brazil assessed the acceptability and suitability of screening sexually transmitted infections (STIs), such as Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae, by sampling multiple anatomical sites (i.e. urethral, anorectal, oropharyngeal, and neovaginal), and utilizing self- or provider-collection methods. First, a convenience sample of 23 cohort participants were recruited during a scheduled study visit between October and November 2018. Data collection was through a short investigator-led quantitative survey in Portuguese, and included presentation of investigator-designed, gender-neutral instructional diagrams to guide self-sampling. Three supplemental focus group discussions (FGDs) with a total of 30 participants guided by semi-structured script were conducted in Portuguese between September and October 2019. All participants reported being assigned male sex at birth and self-identified with a feminine gender identity at time of study. All survey respondents (100%; n = 23) indicated willingness to provide samples for STI screening during a future study visit. Preference was for self-collection of urine samples (83%; n = 19), urethral swabs (82%; n = 18), and anorectal swabs (77%; n = 17). A lower preference for self-collection of oropharyngeal swabs (48%; n = 11) was observed. Most respondents (78%; n = 18) indicated that they would not prefer specimens to be collected by a health professional, mainly due to 'more privacy' (72%; n = 13). All respondents indicated that they would feel comfortable to provide a self-collected sample based on instructional diagrams shown. In FGDs, although the collection by a health professional was described as a technically safer option for some participants, there was a preference for self-collection to avoid discomfort and embarrassment in exposing the body. Overall, this sub-study suggested acceptability among transgender women of introducing self-sampling for etiological diagnosis of STIs from potential infection sites. Uptake and usability will be explored further in a cross-sectional STI prevalence study of transgender women in Brazil.

Indexed as

Chlamydia InfectionsGonorrheaSexually Transmitted DiseasesTransgender PersonsAdolescentAdultBrazilChlamydia trachomatisCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGender IdentityHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedNeisseria gonorrhoeaeChlamydia trachomatisNeisseria gonorrhoeaeSelf-samplingSexually transmitted infections (STIs)Transgender women

Identifiers

PMID35513055
PMCPMC9387447
OpenAlexW4225291730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.