ArticleSleep2022
Hypocretin-1 measurements in cerebrospinal fluid using radioimmunoassay: within and between assay reliability and limit of quantification.
Article in Sleep, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hypocretin-1/orexin-A fragment1-16 as a potential surrogate marker for diagnosing narcolepsy type 1.Sleep · 2026Article
- A lumbar puncture for all who are sleepy?Sleep · 2026Article
- Therapeutic potential of targeting the orexin (hypocretin) system in sleep disorders.Nature reviews. Endocrinology · 2026Review
- Human narcolepsy is linked to degeneration of both locus coeruleus and hypocretin neurons.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Present and Future of Central Disorders of Hypersomnolence.Journal of sleep research · 2025Review
- Progress in Procalcitonin Detection Based on Immunoassay.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
STUDY
objectivesThe most sensitive and specific investigative method for the diagnosis of narcolepsy type 1 (NT1) is the determination of hypocretin-1 (orexin-A) deficiency (≤110 pg/mL) in cerebrospinal fluid using a radioimmunoassay (RIA). We aimed to assess the reliability of the Phoenix Pharmaceuticals hypocretin-1 RIA, by determining the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ), the variability around the cutoff of 110 pg/mL, and the inter- and intra-assay variability.
methodsRaw data of 80 consecutive hypocretin-1 RIAs were used to estimate the intra- and inter-assay coefficient of variation (CV). The LLOQ was established and defined as the lowest converted concentration with a CV <25%; the conversion is performed using a harmonization sample which is internationally used to minimize variation between RIAs.
resultsThe mean intra-assay CV was 4.7%, while the unconverted inter-assay CV was 28.3% (18.5% excluding 2 outliers) and 7.5% when converted to international values. The LLOQ was determined as 27.9 pg/mL. The intra-assay CV of RIAs with lower specific radioactive activity showed a median of 5.6% (n = 41, range 1.6%-17.0%), which was significantly higher than in RIAs with higher specific activity (n = 36; median 3.2%, range 0.4%-11.6%, p = .013). The CV around the 110 pg/mL cutoff was <7%.
conclusionsHypocretin-1 RIAs should always be harmonized using standard reference material. The specific activity of an RIA has a significant impact on its reliability, because of the decay of 125I radioactivity. Values around the hypocretin-1 cut-off can reliably be measured. Hypocretin-1 concentrations below 28 pg/mL should be reported as "undetectable" when measured with the Phoenix Pharmaceuticals RIA. CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION: This study is not registered in a clinical trial register, as it has a retrospective database design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.