Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35512499›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2022

Development of an environmental contamination model to simulate the microbial bloom that occurs in commercial hatch cabinets.

B D Graham, C M Selby, A J Forga, M E Coles, L C Beer, L E Graham, K D Teague, G Tellez-Isaias, B M Hargis, C N Vuong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

B D GrahamDepartment of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA. Electronic address: bmahaffe@uark.edu.
C M SelbyDepartment of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA.
A J ForgaDepartment of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA.
M E ColesDepartment of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA.
L C BeerDepartment of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA.
L E GrahamDepartment of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA.
K D TeagueDepartment of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA.
G Tellez-IsaiasDepartment of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA.
B M HargisDepartment of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA.
C N VuongDepartment of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbial blooms that emerge in commercial hatch cabinets consist of apathogenic and pathogenic microorganisms, including Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecalis, and Aspergillus fumigatus. Objectives of the present study included the development of a multipathogen contamination model to mimic commercial conditions and optimization of sampling methods to quantify bacterial or fungal presence within the hatch cabinet. The pathogen challenge mix (PM) was recreated from select bacterial or fungal isolates recovered from an egg homogenate (EH) derived from the contents of infertile eggs and late embryonic mortalities. Isolates selected for PM included Enterococcus faecalis (∼10

Indexed as

ChickensOvumAnimalsBacteriaEgg ShellEscherichia colibroilerchallengehatcherymodelpathogen

Identifiers

PMID35512499
PMCPMC9079238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.