ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2022
A new approach to testing mediation of the microbiome at both the community and individual taxon levels.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bibliometric analysis of research trends and hotspots on the microbial mediation effects.Antonie van Leeuwenhoek · 2026Article
- Phylogeny-informed random forests for human microbiome studies.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Microbiome mediation analysis: methods, assumptions, and practical considerations.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
- CRAmed: a conditional randomization test for high-dimensional mediation analysis in sparse microbiome data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Chemical pollution drives taxonomic and functional shifts in marine sediment microbiome, influencing benthic metazoans.ISME communications · 2025Article
- Elevated fecal calprotectin is associated with gut microbial dysbiosis, altered serum markers and clinical outcomes in older individuals.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Statistical and computational methods for integrating microbiome, host genomics, and metabolomics data.eLife · 2024Review
- Gender-affirming hormone therapy preserves skeletal maturation in young mice via the gut microbiome.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2024Article
- Education as Risk Factor of Mild Cognitive Impairment: The Link to the Gut Microbiome.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2024Article
- Specialty grand challenge: how can we use integrative approaches to understand microbial community dynamics?Frontiers in systems biology · 2024Article
- Compositional analysis of microbiome data using the linear decomposition model (LDM).Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- PhyloMed: a phylogeny-based test of mediation effect in microbiome.Genome biology · 2023Article
- Comprehensive microbiome causal mediation analysis using MiMed on user-friendly web interfaces.Biology methods & protocols · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
motivationUnderstanding whether and which microbes played a mediating role between an exposure and a disease outcome are essential for researchers to develop clinical interventions to treat the disease by modulating the microbes. Existing methods for mediation analysis of the microbiome are often limited to a global test of community-level mediation or selection of mediating microbes without control of the false discovery rate (FDR). Further, while the null hypothesis of no mediation at each microbe is a composite null that consists of three types of null, most existing methods treat the microbes as if they were all under the same type of null, leading to excessive false positive results.
resultsWe propose a new approach based on inverse regression that regresses the microbiome data at each taxon on the exposure and the exposure-adjusted outcome. Then, the P-values for testing the coefficients are used to test mediation at both the community and individual taxon levels. This approach fits nicely into our Linear Decomposition Model (LDM) framework, so our new method LDM-med, implemented in the LDM framework, enjoys all the features of the LDM, e.g. allowing an arbitrary number of taxa to be tested simultaneously, supporting continuous, discrete, or multivariate exposures and outcomes (including survival outcomes), and so on. Using extensive simulations, we showed that LDM-med always preserved the FDR of testing individual taxa and had adequate sensitivity; LDM-med always controlled the type I error of the global test and had compelling power over existing methods. The flexibility of LDM-med for a variety of mediation analyses is illustrated by an application to a murine microbiome dataset, which identified several plausible mediating taxa. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Our new method has been added to our R package LDM, which is available on GitHub at https://github.com/yijuanhu/LDM. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.