Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35512239›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2022

Potential effect of two Bacillus probiotic strains on performance and fecal microbiota of breeding sows and their piglets.

Mireia Saladrigas-García, David Solà-Oriol, Sergi López-Vergé, Matilde D'Angelo, Maria Carmen Collado, Bea Nielsen, Martin Faldyna, José Francisco Pérez, Susana M Martín-Orúe

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Microorganisms · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Veterinary sciences · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Role of Nutrition Across Production Stages to Improve Sow Longevity.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. MaternalComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025
    Article
  13. Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  14. Effects ofVeterinary world · 2024
    Article
  15. Characterization of the Effects of a Novel Probiotic onAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  18. Gut Health and Influencing Factors in Pigs.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Mireia Saladrigas-GarcíaDepartment of Animal and Food Sciences, Animal Nutrition and Welfare Service, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra 08193, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6071-887X
David Solà-OriolDepartment of Animal and Food Sciences, Animal Nutrition and Welfare Service, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra 08193, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8365-340X
Sergi López-VergéDepartment of Animal and Food Sciences, Animal Nutrition and Welfare Service, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra 08193, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7499-6045
Matilde D'AngeloDepartment of Animal and Food Sciences, Animal Nutrition and Welfare Service, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra 08193, Spain.
Maria Carmen ColladoDepartment of Biotechnology, Institute of Agrochemistry and Food Technology-National Research Council (IATA-CSIC), Valencia 49860, Spain.
Bea NielsenChr.Hansen A/S, Hoersholm 2970, Denmark.
Martin FaldynaVeterinary Research Institute, Brno 62132, Czech Republic.
José Francisco PérezDepartment of Animal and Food Sciences, Animal Nutrition and Welfare Service, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra 08193, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8853-8945
Susana M Martín-OrúeDepartment of Animal and Food Sciences, Animal Nutrition and Welfare Service, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra 08193, Spain.
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESChr. Hansen (Denmark) · DKInstituto de Agroquímica y Tecnología de Alimentos · ESVeterinary Research Institute · CZ

Funding

Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic QK1810463Ministry of Economy, Industry, and Competitiveness of Spain AGL2016-75463-RSpanish Ministry of Science and Innovation BES-2017-080018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The effect of long-term administration of two Bacillus strains was tested on 98 breeding sows and their litters allotted into three treatments: a control group (CON); supplemented with 5 × 108 cfu/kg B. subtilis - 541 (BSU); or with 5 × 108 cfu/kg B. amyloliquefaciens - 516 (BAM). Reproductive and performance variables were recorded over three cycles with 56 dams remaining through the third lactation. Blood and fecal samples were taken longitudinally from 12 sows per treatment on days 8 and 21 of the third lactation and milk samples were taken on day 21. Feces from one piglet per litter was sampled on days 21 and 33 and jejunal gene expression was assessed in two piglets on day 21. Changes in fecal microbiota were assessed by 16S rRNA gene sequencing (Illumina MiSeq) and gene expression by Open-Array technology. Metabolomic responses were analyzed in milk by NMR and Ig-G and Ig-A specific antibodies were determined by ELISA. No significant differences were observed on feed intake, body weight, or fat mobilization of the sows. However, a significant increase in the total number of piglets born was observed in supplemented sows. Although the increase was seen from the first cycle with BAM, improvements were not seen with BSU until the third cycle. BAM also increased the number of born-alive and weaned piglets. NMR analysis showed an impact of BAM on milk composition. No differences were found in milk or blood immunoglobulins. A different structure of the fecal microbiota was found in supplemented sows, with changes across phylum, family, and genus. These changes were greater at day 8, suggesting a relevant role of probiotics establishing a new intestinal balance after labor. Shifts in the microbiota were also seen in the piglets, with a clearer impact post-weaning than in suckling. In this regard, correlations between microbial groups of sows and piglets showed a higher link with weaned (d33) than with suckling pigs (d21), reinforcing the idea of an early maternal carry-over. No changes due to treatment in jejunal gene expression were detected; however, piglet size had a clear impact on different genes. In summary, the addition of both probiotics, and particularly Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, demonstrated potential benefits on the prolificacy of sows. Daily feeding of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens resulted in an increase in the number of weaned piglets. The high correlations between the compositions of the microbiota of sows and their piglets are evidence of maternal imprinting, with effects lasting beyond weaning.

Indexed as

BacillusMicrobiotaProbioticsAnimal FeedAnimalsDietDietary SupplementsFecesFemaleLactationRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSwineWeaningRNA, Ribosomal, 16SBacillus amyloliquefaciensBacillus subtilismicrobiotapigletprobioticsow

Identifiers

PMID35512239
PMCPMC9175292
OpenAlexW4229007996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.