Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35512195›Full record

ArticlePlant physiology2022

Integrating GWAS and TWAS to elucidate the genetic architecture of maize leaf cuticular conductance.

Meng Lin, Pengfei Qiao, Susanne Matschi, Miguel Vasquez, Guillaume P Ramstein, Richard Bourgault, Marc Mohammadi, Michael J Scanlon, Isabel Molina, Laurie G Smith and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant physiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. In silico prediction of variant effects: promises and limitations for precision plant breeding.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Meng LinPlant Breeding and Genetics Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5216-6430
Pengfei QiaoPlant Biology Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8186-0851
Susanne MatschiSection of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6233-2519
Miguel VasquezSection of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8149-4142
Guillaume P RamsteinInstitute for Genomic Diversity, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7536-1113
Richard BourgaultDepartment of Biology, Algoma University, Sault Ste Marie, ON P6A 2G4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9502-8801
Marc MohammadiDepartment of Biology, Algoma University, Sault Ste Marie, ON P6A 2G4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7503-9784
Michael J ScanlonPlant Biology Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1708-3490
Isabel MolinaDepartment of Biology, Algoma University, Sault Ste Marie, ON P6A 2G4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3450-893X
Laurie G SmithSection of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8294-1589
Michael A GorePlant Breeding and Genetics Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6896-8024
Cornell University · USAlgoma University · CAUniversity of California San Diego · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cuticle, a hydrophobic layer of cutin and waxes synthesized by plant epidermal cells, is the major barrier to water loss when stomata are closed. Dissecting the genetic architecture of natural variation for maize (Zea mays L.) leaf cuticular conductance (gc) is important for identifying genes relevant to improving crop productivity in drought-prone environments. To this end, we performed an integrated genome- and transcriptome-wide association studies (GWAS and TWAS) to identify candidate genes putatively regulating variation in leaf gc. Of the 22 plausible candidate genes identified, 4 were predicted to be involved in cuticle precursor biosynthesis and export, 2 in cell wall modification, 9 in intracellular membrane trafficking, and 7 in the regulation of cuticle development. A gene encoding an INCREASED SALT TOLERANCE1-LIKE1 (ISTL1) protein putatively involved in intracellular protein and membrane trafficking was identified in GWAS and TWAS as the strongest candidate causal gene. A set of maize nested near-isogenic lines that harbor the ISTL1 genomic region from eight donor parents were evaluated for gc, confirming the association between gc and ISTL1 in a haplotype-based association analysis. The findings of this study provide insights into the role of regulatory variation in the development of the maize leaf cuticle and will ultimately assist breeders to develop drought-tolerant maize for target environments.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyZea maysPlant LeavesTranscriptomeWaxesWaxes

Identifiers

PMID35512195
PMCPMC9342973
OpenAlexW4226484281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.