Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35512090›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022

Transient learning degrees of freedom for introducing function in materials.

Varda F Hagh, Sidney R Nagel, Andrea J Liu, M Lisa Manning, Eric I Corwin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A minimal vertex model explains how the amnioserosa avoids fluidization duringProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Bifurcation instructed design of multistate machines.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Varda F HaghJames Franck Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637.ORCID 0000-0002-2148-3289
Sidney R NagelJames Franck Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637.ORCID 0000-0003-3486-8898
Andrea J LiuDepartment of Physics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104.ORCID 0000-0002-2295-2729
M Lisa ManningDepartment of Physics, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY 13244.ORCID 0000-0001-7682-2324
Eric I CorwinDepartment of Physics and Materials Science Institute, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403.ORCID 0000-0002-0019-2837

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

SignificanceMany protocols used in material design and training have a common theme: they introduce new degrees of freedom, often by relaxing away existing constraints, and then evolve these degrees of freedom based on a rule that leads the material to a desired state at which point these new degrees of freedom are frozen out. By creating a unifying framework for these protocols, we can now understand that some protocols work better than others because the choice of new degrees of freedom matters. For instance, introducing particle sizes as degrees of freedom to the minimization of a jammed particle packing can lead to a highly stable state, whereas particle stiffnesses do not have nearly the same impact.

Indexed as

degrees of freedomjammingmaterial trainingmechanical stabilitymetamaterials

Identifiers

PMID35512090
PMCPMC9171605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.