Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35512031›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Factors related to the suppression of the antitumour immune response in female dogs with inflammatory mammary carcinoma.

Karine Araújo Damasceno, Aline Michelle Dos Santos-Conceição, Laís Pereira Silva, Thiago Marconi de Souza Cardoso, Carlos Humberto da Costa Vieira-Filho, Samantha Hellen Santos Figuerêdo, Emanoel Martins-Filho, Barbra Gabriela Oliveira de Faria, João Moreira da Costa-Neto, Geovanni Dantas Cassali and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Editorial: New insights in veterinary cancer immunology.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Karine Araújo DamascenoLaboratory of Experimental Pathology, Gonçalo Moniz Institute, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
Aline Michelle Dos Santos-ConceiçãoResearch Center on Mammary Oncology NPqOM/HOSPMEV, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
Laís Pereira SilvaResearch Center on Mammary Oncology NPqOM/HOSPMEV, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
Thiago Marconi de Souza CardosoLaboratory of Clinical Research, Gonçalo Moniz Institute, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
Carlos Humberto da Costa Vieira-FilhoResearch Center on Mammary Oncology NPqOM/HOSPMEV, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
Samantha Hellen Santos FiguerêdoLaboratory of Experimental Pathology, Gonçalo Moniz Institute, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
Emanoel Martins-FilhoResearch Center on Mammary Oncology NPqOM/HOSPMEV, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
Barbra Gabriela Oliveira de FariaPostgraduate Program in Animal Science in the Tropics, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
João Moreira da Costa-NetoResearch Center on Mammary Oncology NPqOM/HOSPMEV, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
Geovanni Dantas CassaliLaboratory of Comparative Pathology, Department of General Pathology, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Alessandra Estrela-LimaResearch Center on Mammary Oncology NPqOM/HOSPMEV, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9879-7999
Universidade Federal da Bahia · BRUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inflammatory mammary carcinoma (IMC), a neoplasia affecting women and female dogs, is considered an aggressive cancer with high metastatic potential and a low survival rate. Studies focused on the tumour microenvironment indicate that the aggressive behaviour of this tumour is primarily correlated with immunological factors as well as inflammation. The objective of this study was to analyse the possible strategies used by the tumour cells to suppress the immune response in female dogs with IMC. Forty-six female dogs were divided into three groups: control (C, n = 10), IMC (n = 14) and mammary carcinoma (MC, n = 22). Clinical-pathological evaluations, survival at follow-up, immunophenotyping of leukocytes in peripheral blood and tumours, and immunohistochemical evaluation of CD4+, granzyme B, perforin and FAS-L were performed. Clinical and pathological results showed a higher frequency of the primary form of neoplasia, solid arrays of tumor cells and a lower survival rate in the IMC group (30 days). Morphometric analysis of inflammatory infiltrate revealed more lymphocytes and macrophages in the IMC group. Immunophenotyping analysis of peripheral blood revealed a higher frequency of CD8+ T-cells (p = 0.0017), a lower frequency of CD4+ T-cells (p <0.0001), and significantly higher mean MHCI and MHCII CD14+ fluorescence intensity in the IMC group (p = 0.038 and p = 0.0117, respectively). The immunohistochemical evaluation of tumour sections showed fewer FAS-L-positive inflammatory cells in the IMC group. These results suggest the important contribution of CD8+ T-cells, macrophages and FAS-L in the aggressiveness of IMC.

Indexed as

CarcinomaDog DiseasesInflammatory Breast NeoplasmsMammary Neoplasms, AnimalAnimalsDogsFemaleHumansImmunityTumor Microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID35512031
PMCPMC9071162
OpenAlexW4229075285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.