ArticleVeterinary ophthalmology2022
A prospective, masked, randomized, controlled superiority study comparing the incidence of corneal injury following general anesthesia in dogs with two methods of corneal protection.
Article in Veterinary ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Perioperative decline in quantitative and qualitative tear film parameters in clinically healthy mesocephalicVeterinary world · 2025Article
- Impact of general anesthesia on feline aqueous tear production and the feline corneal epithelium.Journal of feline medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Ocular Surface Fluid: More than a Matrix.Toxics · 2024Review
- Genome-wide association studies with prolapsed gland of the third eyelid in dogs.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024Article
- Mechanical ventilation in dogs and cats with tick paralysis.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2023Review
- Mechanical ventilation in snake envenomation of dogs and cats.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2023Review
- A prospective, masked, randomized, controlled superiority study comparing the incidence of corneal injury following general anesthesia in dogs with two methods of corneal protection.Veterinary ophthalmology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo compare the incidence of corneal injury during general anesthesia (GA) and the immediate post-operative period in eyes protected with topical ocular lubricant alone with eyes protected with topical lubricant followed by complete eyelid closure using tape. ANIMALS STUDIED: One hundred client-owned dogs (200 eyes) undergoing GA for MRI scan.
methodsPatients had ocular lubricant applied to both eyes upon induction of anesthesia. One eye was taped closed immediately after induction for the duration of anesthesia using Strappal® tape (BSN medical™; treatment group), and the other eye was not taped (control group). Eyes were randomly allocated to a treatment group. Ophthalmic examination was performed before and after anesthesia; the examiner was masked to eye treatment groups. Corneal injury was defined as corneal ulceration or corneal erosion. A McNemar's test was used to compare the incidence of corneal injury between groups. A paired-samples t-test was used to compare Schirmer-1 tear test (STT-1) readings between groups.
resultsSixteen eyes (8%) developed corneal erosion. No corneal ulceration occurred. There was no significant difference between incidence of corneal erosion between groups (p = .454). There was a significant decrease in STT-1 readings following GA in both groups (p < .001), with no significant difference in STT-1 between groups (p = .687). No adverse effects of taping the eye closed were observed.
conclusionTaping the eyes closed during GA had no additional benefit to the lubrication protocol used in this study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.