ArticlePloS one2022
Access to maternal health services during COVID-19 pandemic, re-examining the three delays among pregnant women in Ilubabor zone, southwest Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study.
Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on the Utilization of Maternal Health Services in Chandigarh and Kalyani, West Bengal, India: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India · 2025Article
- Maternal delay for institutional delivery and associated factors among postnatal mothers at Southeastern Ethiopia: a cross sectional study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2024Article
- COVID-19-related dysfunctional anxiety and associated factors among adolescents in Southwest Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study.BMC psychiatry · 2024Article
- Lesson Learned During a Pandemic: A Phenomenological Study of Pregnant Women's Experience in Resource-Limited Setting.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2024Article
- Delay in reaching health facilities for emergency obstetric care and associated factors among postpartum mothers at Bale zones, Ethiopia. A cross-sectional study.PLOS global public health · 2024Article
- Article
- Postnatal care services availability and utilization during the COVID-19 era in sub-Saharan Africa: A rapid review.Women and birth : journal of the Australian College of Midwives · 2023Review
- An integrative literature review on the impact of COVID-19 on maternal and child health in Africa.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAll women require access to high-quality care during pregnancy, labor, and after childbirth. The occurrence of delay at any stage is one of the major causes of maternal mortality. There is, however, a scarcity of data on women's access to maternal health services during the COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, the goal of this study was to assess the magnitude of delays in maternal health service utilization and its associated factors among pregnant women in the Ilubabor zone during the COVID-19 pandemic.
methodsA facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted among 402 pregnant women selected by systematic random sampling. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 26. Descriptive and summary statistics were used to describe the study population. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with the outcome variables. Adjusted odds ratio with respective 95% CI was used to report significant covariates.
resultsA total of 402 pregnant women participated in this study. The median age of the respondents was 25 years (IQR = 8). On average, a woman stays 1.76 hours (SD = 1.2) to make a decision to seek care. The prevalence of first, second and third delay were 51%, 48%, and 33.3%, respectively. Being unmarried [AOR (95% CI)], [0.145 (0.046-0.452)], being unemployed [AOR (95% CI)], [4.824 (1.685-13.814)], age [AOR (95% CI)], [0.227 (0.089-0.0579)], fear of COVID-19 [AOR (95% CI)], [1.112 (1.036-1.193)], urban residence [AOR (95% CI)], [0.517 (0.295-0.909)], and lack of birth preparedness [AOR (95% CI)], [6.526 (1.954-21.789)] were significantly associated with first delay. Being unmarried [AOR (95% CI)], [5.984 (2.930-12.223)], being unemployed [AOR (95% CI)], [26.978 (3.477-209.308)], and age [AOR (95% CI)], [0.438 (0.226-0.848)] were significantly associated with second delay. Having lengthy admission [AOR (95% CI)], [7.5 (4.053-13.878)] and non-spontaneous vaginal delivery [AOR (95% CI)], [1.471 (1.018-1.999)] were significantly associated with third delay.
conclusionThis study identified a significant proportion of mothers experiencing delays, although there were no data to suggest exacerbated delays in utilizing maternal health services due to fear of the COVID-19 pandemic. The proportion of maternal delay varies with different factors. Improving the decision-making capacity of women is, therefore, essential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.