Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35511882›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

E-CatBoost: An efficient machine learning framework for predicting ICU mortality using the eICU Collaborative Research Database.

Nima Safaei, Babak Safaei, Seyedhouman Seyedekrami, Mojtaba Talafidaryani, Arezoo Masoud, Shaodong Wang, Qing Li, Mahdi Moqri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Machine Learning for Benchmarking Critical Care Outcomes.Healthcare informatics research · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nima SafaeiDepartment of Business Analytics and Information Systems, Tippie College of Business, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2491-6211
Babak SafaeiCivil and Environmental Engineering Department, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States of America.
Seyedhouman SeyedekramiDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Nevada, Reno, NV, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2780-6832
Mojtaba TalafidaryaniDepartment of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
Arezoo MasoudDepartment of Business Analytics and Information Systems, Tippie College of Business, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States of America.
Shaodong WangDepartment of Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States of America.
Qing LiDepartment of Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States of America.
Mahdi MoqriDepartment of Information Systems and Business Analytics, Ivy College of Business, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Improving the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) management network and building cost-effective and well-managed healthcare systems are high priorities for healthcare units. Creating accurate and explainable mortality prediction models helps identify the most critical risk factors in the patients' survival/death status and early detect the most in-need patients. This study proposes a highly accurate and efficient machine learning model for predicting ICU mortality status upon discharge using the information available during the first 24 hours of admission. The most important features in mortality prediction are identified, and the effects of changing each feature on the prediction are studied. We used supervised machine learning models and illness severity scoring systems to benchmark the mortality prediction. We also implemented a combination of SHAP, LIME, partial dependence, and individual conditional expectation plots to explain the predictions made by the best-performing model (CatBoost). We proposed E-CatBoost, an optimized and efficient patient mortality prediction model, which can accurately predict the patients' discharge status using only ten input features. We used eICU-CRD v2.0 to train and validate the models; the dataset contains information on over 200,000 ICU admissions. The patients were divided into twelve disease groups, and models were fitted and tuned for each group. The models' predictive performance was evaluated using the area under a receiver operating curve (AUROC). The AUROC scores were 0.86 [std:0.02] to 0.92 [std:0.02] for CatBoost and 0.83 [std:0.02] to 0.91 [std:0.03] for E-CatBoost models across the defined disease groups; if measured over the entire patient population, their AUROC scores were 7 to 18 and 2 to 12 percent higher than the baseline models, respectively. Based on SHAP explanations, we found age, heart rate, respiratory rate, blood urine nitrogen, and creatinine level as the most critical cross-disease features in mortality predictions.

Indexed as

Hospital MortalityIntensive Care UnitsDatabases, FactualData ManagementHumansMachine Learning

Identifiers

PMID35511882
PMCPMC9070907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.