Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35511877›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Breast cancer histopathological images classification based on deep semantic features and gray level co-occurrence matrix.

Yan Hao, Li Zhang, Shichang Qiao, Yanping Bai, Rong Cheng, Hongxin Xue, Yuchao Hou, Wendong Zhang, Guojun Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yan HaoDepartment of Mathematics, Taiyuan Normal University, Taiyuan, China.
Li ZhangDepartment of Mathematics, School of Science, North University of China, Taiyuan, China.
Shichang QiaoDepartment of Mathematics, School of Science, North University of China, Taiyuan, China.
Yanping BaiDepartment of Mathematics, School of Science, North University of China, Taiyuan, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2043-8363
Rong ChengDepartment of Mathematics, School of Science, North University of China, Taiyuan, China.
Hongxin XueData Science and Technology, North University of China, Taiyuan, China.
Yuchao HouSchool of Information and Communication Engineering, North University of China, Taiyuan, China.
Wendong ZhangSchool of Instrument and Electronics, Key Laboratory of Dynamic Testing Technology, North University of China, Taiyuan, China.
Guojun ZhangSchool of Instrument and Electronics, Key Laboratory of Dynamic Testing Technology, North University of China, Taiyuan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer is regarded as the leading killer of women today. The early diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer is the key to improving the survival rate of patients. A method of breast cancer histopathological images recognition based on deep semantic features and gray level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) features is proposed in this paper. Taking the pre-trained DenseNet201 as the basic model, part of the convolutional layer features of the last dense block are extracted as the deep semantic features, which are then fused with the three-channel GLCM features, and the support vector machine (SVM) is used for classification. For the BreaKHis dataset, we explore the classification problems of magnification specific binary (MSB) classification and magnification independent binary (MIB) classification, and compared the performance with the seven baseline models of AlexNet, VGG16, ResNet50, GoogLeNet, DenseNet201, SqueezeNet and Inception-ResNet-V2. The experimental results show that the method proposed in this paper performs better than the pre-trained baseline models in MSB and MIB classification problems. The highest image-level recognition accuracy of 40×, 100×, 200×, 400× is 96.75%, 95.21%, 96.57%, and 93.15%, respectively. And the highest patient-level recognition accuracy of the four magnifications is 96.33%, 95.26%, 96.09%, and 92.99%, respectively. The image-level and patient-level recognition accuracy for MIB classification is 95.56% and 95.54%, respectively. In addition, the recognition accuracy of the method in this paper is comparable to some state-of-the-art methods.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsNeural Networks, ComputerBreastFemaleHumansSemanticsSupport Vector Machine

Identifiers

PMID35511877
PMCPMC9070886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.