ArticlePloS one2022
Breast cancer histopathological images classification based on deep semantic features and gray level co-occurrence matrix.
Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- BC-SwinNet: Swin transformer and CNN with multi-objective optimization for multi-class breast cancer detection using Histopathological images.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Non-Destructive Detection of Internal Quality of Sanhua Plum Based on Multi-Source Information Fusion.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Advancing breast cancer diagnosis: token vision transformers for faster and accurate classification of histopathology images.Visual computing for industry, biomedicine, and art · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence integrates multi-omics data for precision stratification and drug resistance prediction in breast cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Deep Learning Glioma Grading with the Tumor Microenvironment Analysis Protocol for Comprehensive Learning, Discovering, and Quantifying Microenvironmental Features.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2024Article
- Enhancing Interpretability in Medical Image Classification by Integrating Formal Concept Analysis with Convolutional Neural Networks.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- AI Deployment on GBM Diagnosis: A Novel Approach to Analyze Histopathological Images Using Image Feature-Based Analysis.Cancers · 2023Article
- Lightweight Separable Convolution Network for Breast Cancer Histopathological Identification.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Efficient Breast Cancer Classification Network with Dual Squeeze and Excitation in Histopathological Images.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Application of Deep Learning in Histopathology Images of Breast Cancer: A Review.Micromachines · 2022Review
- Breast Cancer Dataset, Classification and Detection Using Deep Learning.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Multiclass classification of breast cancer histopathology images using multilevel features of deep convolutional neural network.Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer is regarded as the leading killer of women today. The early diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer is the key to improving the survival rate of patients. A method of breast cancer histopathological images recognition based on deep semantic features and gray level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) features is proposed in this paper. Taking the pre-trained DenseNet201 as the basic model, part of the convolutional layer features of the last dense block are extracted as the deep semantic features, which are then fused with the three-channel GLCM features, and the support vector machine (SVM) is used for classification. For the BreaKHis dataset, we explore the classification problems of magnification specific binary (MSB) classification and magnification independent binary (MIB) classification, and compared the performance with the seven baseline models of AlexNet, VGG16, ResNet50, GoogLeNet, DenseNet201, SqueezeNet and Inception-ResNet-V2. The experimental results show that the method proposed in this paper performs better than the pre-trained baseline models in MSB and MIB classification problems. The highest image-level recognition accuracy of 40×, 100×, 200×, 400× is 96.75%, 95.21%, 96.57%, and 93.15%, respectively. And the highest patient-level recognition accuracy of the four magnifications is 96.33%, 95.26%, 96.09%, and 92.99%, respectively. The image-level and patient-level recognition accuracy for MIB classification is 95.56% and 95.54%, respectively. In addition, the recognition accuracy of the method in this paper is comparable to some state-of-the-art methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.