Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35511858›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2022

Estimating heterogeneity of physical function treatment response to caloric restriction among older adults with obesity.

Daniel P Beavers, Katherine L Hsieh, Dalane W Kitzman, Stephen B Kritchevsky, Stephen P Messier, Rebecca H Neiberg, Barbara J Nicklas, W Jack Rejeski, Kristen M Beavers

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. EffectS of Lifestyle Interventions in Older PEople With Obesity (Effective SLOPE): a Systematic Review With Network Meta-Analyses.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Design, analysis, and interpretation of treatment response heterogeneity in personalized nutrition and obesity treatment research.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2023 · on this map
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniel P BeaversDepartment of Biostatistics and Data Science, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4286-9463
Katherine L HsiehSection on Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, United States of America.
Dalane W KitzmanSection on Cardiovascular Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, United States of America.
Stephen B KritchevskySection on Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, United States of America.
Stephen P MessierDepartment of Health and Exercise Science, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, United States of America.
Rebecca H NeibergDepartment of Biostatistics and Data Science, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, United States of America.
Barbara J NicklasSection on Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, United States of America.
W Jack RejeskiDepartment of Health and Exercise Science, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, United States of America.
Kristen M BeaversDepartment of Health and Exercise Science, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, United States of America.
Wake Forest University · US

Funding

Wake Forest Claude D. Pepper OAIC - RenewalP30AG021332 · NIA · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI LEON LENCHIK · 2002 to 2026
$36.4M
Exercise Intolerance in Older HFPEF PatientsR01AG018915 · NIA · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI KITZMAN, DALANE W · 2001 to 2019
$5.2M
Loss of fat tissue and functional responses to exercise in older, obese adultsR01AG020583 · NIA · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI NICKLAS, BARBARA J · 2002 to 2013
$4.0M
Translational Training in Aging and Alzheimer’s Disease Related DisordersT32AG033534 · NIA · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI STEPHEN B. KRITCHEVSKY · 2009 to 2026
$3.6M
Effect of fat loss on functional and cardiovascular benefits of aerobic exerciseR01HL093713 · NHLBI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI NICKLAS, BARBARA J · 2009 to 2013
$3.4M
Intensive Dietary Restriction with Exercise in ArthritisR01AR052528 · NIAMS · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY · PI MESSIER, STEPHEN P · 2006 to 2010
$2.9M
Cooperative Lifestyle Intervention ProgramR01HL076441 · NHLBI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY · PI REJESKI, WALTER JOHN · 2005 to 2009
$2.9M
Variable adaptive responses to weight loss in older adults (VARIA)R21AG061344 · NIA · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI BEAVERS, DANIEL P, BEAVERS, KRISTEN MARIE · 2019 to 2020
$436k
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL076441NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL093713NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR052528NIA NIH HHS P30 AG021332NIA NIH HHS R01 AG018915NIA NIH HHS R01 AG020583NIA NIH HHS R21 AG061344NIA NIH HHS T32 AG033534
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical trials conventionally test aggregate mean differences and assume homogeneous variances across treatment groups. However, significant response heterogeneity may exist. The purpose of this study was to model treatment response variability using gait speed change among older adults participating in caloric restriction (CR) trials. Eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with five- or six-month assessments were pooled, including 749 participants randomized to CR and 594 participants randomized to non-CR (NoCR). Statistical models compared means and variances by CR assignment and exercise assignment or select subgroups, testing for treatment differences and interactions for mean changes and standard deviations. Continuous equivalents of dichotomized variables were also fit. Models used a Bayesian framework, and posterior estimates were presented as means and 95% Bayesian credible intervals (BCI). At baseline, participants were 67.7 (SD = 5.4) years, 69.8% female, and 79.2% white, with a BMI of 33.9 (4.4) kg/m2. CR participants reduced body mass [CR: -7.7 (5.8) kg vs. NoCR: -0.9 (3.5) kg] and increased gait speed [CR: +0.10 (0.16) m/s vs. NoCR: +0.07 (0.15) m/s] more than NoCR participants. There were no treatment differences in gait speed change standard deviations [CR-NoCR: -0.002 m/s (95% BCI: -0.013, 0.009)]. Significant mean interactions between CR and exercise assignment [0.037 m/s (95% BCI: 0.004, 0.070)], BMI [0.034 m/s (95% BCI: 0.003, 0.066)], and IL-6 [0.041 m/s (95% BCI: 0.009, 0.073)] were observed, while variance interactions were observed between CR and exercise assignment [-0.458 m/s (95% BCI: -0.783, -0.138)], age [-0.557 m/s (95% BCI: -0.900, -0.221)], and gait speed [-0.530 m/s (95% BCI: -1.018, -0.062)] subgroups. Caloric restriction plus exercise yielded the greatest gait speed benefit among older adults with obesity. High BMI and IL-6 subgroups also improved gait speed in response to CR. Results provide a novel statistical framework for identifying treatment heterogeneity in RCTs.

Indexed as

Caloric RestrictionInterleukin-6AgedExerciseFemaleHumansMaleObesityWalking SpeedInterleukin-6

Identifiers

PMID35511858
PMCPMC9070937
OpenAlexW4229024655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.