ArticlePloS one2022
Body-Worn Sensors for Parkinson's disease: A qualitative approach with patients and healthcare professionals.
Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- The experience and perception of wearable devices in Parkinson's disease patients: a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies.Journal of neurology · 2025Pooled it
- Transformation of Parkinson's care through SMART-PD (Self-Management, Remote monitoring and Timely review for Parkinson's Disease): Care pathway mapping with clinical experts.Journal of Parkinson's disease · 2026Article
- A new method using pointing area diagrams to characterize and compare ventilation masks used in continuous positive airway pressure treatment for apneic patients.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Article
- A systematic review on patient and public attitudes toward health monitoring technologies across countries.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Diverse preferences, different solutions: Exploring remote monitoring preferences in Parkinson's disease through a discrete choice experiment.Journal of Parkinson's disease · 2025Article
- How can patients shape digital medicine? A rapid review of patient and public involvement and engagement in the development of digital health technologies for neurological conditions.Expert review of pharmacoeconomics & outcomes research · 2025Review
- Human Factors, Human-Centered Design, and Usability of Sensor-Based Digital Health Technologies: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- Patient Experience and Feasibility of a Remote Monitoring System in Parkinson's Disease.Movement disorders clinical practice · 2024Observational
- Article
- Patient perspectives on the use of digital medical devices and health data for AI-driven personalised medicine in Parkinson's Disease.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- Overview on wearable sensors for the management of Parkinson's disease.NPJ Parkinson's disease · 2023Review
- Mapping Relevance of Digital Measures to Meaningful Symptoms and Impacts in Early Parkinson's Disease.Journal of Parkinson's disease · 2023Article
- Successful implementation of technology in the management of Parkinson's disease: Barriers and facilitators.Clinical parkinsonism & related disorders · 2023Review
- Article
- The most used questionnaires for evaluating the usability of robots and smart wearables: A scoping review.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Body-Worn Sensors (BWS) provide reliable objective and continuous assessment of Parkinson's disease (PD) motor symptoms, but their implementation in clinical routine has not yet become widespread. Users' perceptions of BWS have not been explored. This study intended to evaluate the usability, user experience (UX), patients' perceptions of BWS, and health professionals' (HP) opinions on BWS monitoring. A qualitative analysis was performed from semi-structured interviews conducted with 22 patients and 9 HP experts in PD. Patients completed two interviews before and after the BWS one-week experiment, and they answered two questionnaires assessing the usability and UX. Patients rated the three BWS usability with high scores (SUS median [range]: 87.5 [72.5-100]). The UX across all dimensions of their interaction with the BWS was positive. During interviews, all patients and HP expressed interest in BWS monitoring. Patients' hopes and expectations increased the more they learned about BWS. They manifested enthusiasm to wear BWS, which they imagined could improve their PD symptoms. HP highlighted needs for logistical support in the implementation of BWS in their practice. Both patients and HP suggested possible uses of BWS monitoring in clinical practice, for treatment adjustments for example, or for research purposes. Patients and HP shared ideas about the use of BWS monitoring, although patients may be more likely to integrate BWS into their disease follow-up compared to HP in their practice. This study highlights gaps that need to be fulfilled to facilitate BWS adoption and promote their potential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.