Observational studyPloS one2022
Evaluation of blood cell count parameters as predictors of treatment failure of malaria in Angola: An observational study.
Observational study in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Molecular prevalence and clinical profiles of canine babesiosis in northern India.BMC veterinary research · 2026Article
- Aqueous extract of Enantia chlorantha Oliv. demonstrates antimalarial activity and improves redox imbalance and biochemical alterations in mice.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2025Article
- Low prevalence of copy number variation in pfmdr1 and pfpm2 in Plasmodium falciparum isolates from southern Angola.Malaria journal · 2025Article
- Basic coagulation parameters and platelet count among malaria patients attending at Addis Zemen Primary Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia.BMC infectious diseases · 2024Article
- Haematological Profile in Patients With Acute Falciparum Malaria: A Hospital-Based Study.Cureus · 2024Article
- Blood count changes in malaria patients according to blood groups (ABO/Rh) and sickle cell trait.Malaria journal · 2024Observational
- First field and laboratory evaluation of LAMP assay for malaria diagnosis in Cubal, Angola.Parasites & vectors · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite the guidelines provided by the World Health Organization for the treatment of malaria, treatment failure occurs in many hospitalized patients.
objectiveEvaluate whether blood cell count parameters may serve as predictors for malaria treatment. METHODOLOGY: A cross-sectional study with a quantitative approach.
resultsOf the 219 patients, 21.5% showed failure to antimalarial treatment, Patient with 21 and 40 years (72.6%), male (53.4%), from peri-urban area (47.5%), with high parasitemia (59.8%), treated with Arthemeter (90.9%) and the mortality were 5.9%. Significant associations were observed between occupation, level of parasitemia and outcome with resistance to antimalarial treatment (p<0.05). Patients with normal Hb [OR: 0.75 (95% CI: 0.39-1.44), p = 0.393], RBC [OR: 0.83 (95% CI: 0.40-1.72), p = 0.632], RDW [OR: 0.54 (95% CI: 0.27-1.09), p = 0.088], MCV [OR: 0.61 (95% CI: 0.28-1.31), p = 0.204] were less likely to have malaria treatment failures after artemisinin-based therapy failure. In contrast, those with normal values of segmented neutrophils [OR: 0.32 (95% CI: 0.11-0.96), p = 0.042] and lymphocyte counts [OR: 0.24 (95% CI: 0.05-1.04), p = 0.055]. We also found that patients with significant low levels of Hct [OR: 0.31 (95% CI: 0.15-0.64) p = 0.002], and high leukocytes [OR: 8.88 (95% CI: 2.02-37.2), p = 0.004] and normal platelet values [OR: 1.42 (95% CI: 0.73-2.95), p = 0.280] demonstrated high probability of treatment failure.
conclusionThe importance of blood cell count parameters in monitoring malaria therapy necessitates the urgent need to re-evaluate Artemether-based therapy. Future studies involving more participants in different settings are needed to provide further evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.