Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35511769›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2022

Evaluation of blood cell count parameters as predictors of treatment failure of malaria in Angola: An observational study.

Euclides Nenga Manuel Sacomboio, Cruz Dos Santos Sebastião, Silvana Teresa da Costa Salvador, Joaquim António João, Daisy Viviana Sebastião Bapolo, Ngiambudulu M Francisco, Joana Morais, Eduardo Ekundi Valentim

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Euclides Nenga Manuel SacomboioInstituto Nacional de Investigação em Saúde (INIS), Luanda, Angola.ORCID 0000-0002-2341-9133
Cruz Dos Santos SebastiãoInstituto Nacional de Investigação em Saúde (INIS), Luanda, Angola.
Silvana Teresa da Costa SalvadorInstituto Superior de Ciências de Saúde (ISCISA), Universidade Agostinho Neto (UAN), Luanda, Angola.
Joaquim António JoãoInstituto Superior de Ciências de Saúde (ISCISA), Universidade Agostinho Neto (UAN), Luanda, Angola.
Daisy Viviana Sebastião BapoloAnglia Ruskin University (ARU), Chelmsford/England, United Kingdom.
Ngiambudulu M FranciscoInstituto Nacional de Investigação em Saúde (INIS), Luanda, Angola.ORCID 0000-0003-3255-8968
Joana MoraisInstituto Nacional de Investigação em Saúde (INIS), Luanda, Angola.
Eduardo Ekundi ValentimInstituto Politécnico, Universidade Rainha Nginga a Mbande (URNM), Malanje, Angola.
Agostinho Neto University · AOAnglia Ruskin University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the guidelines provided by the World Health Organization for the treatment of malaria, treatment failure occurs in many hospitalized patients.

objectiveEvaluate whether blood cell count parameters may serve as predictors for malaria treatment. METHODOLOGY: A cross-sectional study with a quantitative approach.

resultsOf the 219 patients, 21.5% showed failure to antimalarial treatment, Patient with 21 and 40 years (72.6%), male (53.4%), from peri-urban area (47.5%), with high parasitemia (59.8%), treated with Arthemeter (90.9%) and the mortality were 5.9%. Significant associations were observed between occupation, level of parasitemia and outcome with resistance to antimalarial treatment (p<0.05). Patients with normal Hb [OR: 0.75 (95% CI: 0.39-1.44), p = 0.393], RBC [OR: 0.83 (95% CI: 0.40-1.72), p = 0.632], RDW [OR: 0.54 (95% CI: 0.27-1.09), p = 0.088], MCV [OR: 0.61 (95% CI: 0.28-1.31), p = 0.204] were less likely to have malaria treatment failures after artemisinin-based therapy failure. In contrast, those with normal values of segmented neutrophils [OR: 0.32 (95% CI: 0.11-0.96), p = 0.042] and lymphocyte counts [OR: 0.24 (95% CI: 0.05-1.04), p = 0.055]. We also found that patients with significant low levels of Hct [OR: 0.31 (95% CI: 0.15-0.64) p = 0.002], and high leukocytes [OR: 8.88 (95% CI: 2.02-37.2), p = 0.004] and normal platelet values [OR: 1.42 (95% CI: 0.73-2.95), p = 0.280] demonstrated high probability of treatment failure.

conclusionThe importance of blood cell count parameters in monitoring malaria therapy necessitates the urgent need to re-evaluate Artemether-based therapy. Future studies involving more participants in different settings are needed to provide further evidence.

Indexed as

AntimalarialsMalariaMalaria, FalciparumAngolaBlood Cell CountCross-Sectional StudiesHumansMaleParasitemiaTreatment FailureAntimalarials

Identifiers

PMID35511769
PMCPMC9070872
OpenAlexW4229039665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.