Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35511766›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2022

Serum cotinine cut-points for secondhand smoke exposure assessment in children under 5 years: A systemic review.

Nerea Mourino, Alberto Ruano-Raviña, Leonor Varela Lema, Esteve Fernández, María José López, María Isolina Santiago-Pérez, Julia Rey-Brandariz, Alexandra Giraldo-Osorio, Mónica Pérez-Ríos

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Diverging Trend in Exposure to Environmental Tobacco Smoke Among US Children.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Nerea MourinoDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2008-5913
Alberto Ruano-RaviñaDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Leonor Varela LemaDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8365-7961
Esteve FernándezTobacco Control Unit, WHO Collaborating Center for Tobacco Control, Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO), Badalona, Spain.
María José LópezCIBER Epidemiology and Public Health, CIBERESP, Madrid, Spain.
María Isolina Santiago-PérezEpidemiology Unit, Galician Directorate for Public Health, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Julia Rey-BrandarizDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Alexandra Giraldo-OsorioDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Mónica Pérez-RíosDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Universidade de Santiago de Compostela · ESHospital de Sant Pau · ESInstitut d'Investigació Biomédica de Bellvitge · ESUniversity of Caldas · CO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSerum cotinine has become the most widely used biomarker of secondhand smoke exposure (SHS) over time in all ages. The aim of this study was to review the serum cotinine cut-points used to classify children under 5 years as exposed to SHS.

methodsA systematic review performed in the Pubmed (MEDLINE) and EMBASE databases up to April 2021 was conducted using as key words "serum cotinine", "tobacco smoke pollution" (MeSH), "secondhand smoke", "environmental tobacco smoke" and "tobacco smoke exposure". Papers which assessed SHS exposure among children younger than 5 years old were included. The PRISMA 2020 guidelines were followed. Analysis was pre-registered in PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42021251263).

results247 articles were identified and 51 fulfilled inclusion criteria. The selected studies were published between 1985-2020. Most of them included adolescents and adults. Only three assessed postnatal exposure exclusively among children under 5 years. None of the selected studies proposed age-specific cut-points for children < 5 years old. Cut-point values to assess SHS exposure ranged from 0.015 to 100 ng/ml. The most commonly used cut-point was 0.05 ng/ml, derived from the assay limit of detection used by the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES).

conclusionsNo studies have calculated serum cotinine age-specific cut-points to ascertained SHS exposure among children under 5 years old. Children's age-specific cut-points are warranted for health research and public health purposes aimed at accurately estimating the prevalence of SHS exposure and attributable burden of disease to such exposure, and at reinforcing 100% smoke-free policies worldwide, both in homes, private vehicles and public places.

Indexed as

Smoke-Free PolicyTobacco Smoke PollutionAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolCotinineEnvironmental ExposureHumansNutrition SurveysPrevalenceCotinineTobacco Smoke Pollution

Identifiers

PMID35511766
PMCPMC9070924
OpenAlexW4229019060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.