Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35511697›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of surgery2022

Identification of patients with branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm and very low risk of cancer: multicentre study.

Domenico Tamburrino, Nicolò de Pretis, Enrique Pérez-Cuadrado-Robles, Laura Uribarri-Gonzalez, Zeeshan Ateeb, Giulio Belfiori, Patrick Maisonneuve, Gabriele Capurso, Giuseppe Vanella, Maria Chiara Petrone and 9 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Modern aspects of the management of pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms: a narrative review.Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologie
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 8 institutions in 7 countries.

Domenico TamburrinoPancreatic Surgery Unit, Vita-Salute University, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Centre, San Raffaele Scientific Institute IRCCS, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1435-3651
Nicolò de PretisDepartment of Gastroenterology, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Enrique Pérez-Cuadrado-RoblesDepartment of Hepato-Gastroenterology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.
Laura Uribarri-GonzalezDepartment of Gastroenterology, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Zeeshan AteebPancreatic Surgery Unit, Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Universitetsjukhuset i Huddinge, Huddinge, Sweden.
Giulio BelfioriPancreatic Surgery Unit, Vita-Salute University, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Centre, San Raffaele Scientific Institute IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Patrick MaisonneuveDivision of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5309-4704
Gabriele CapursoDigestive and Liver Disease Unit, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Giuseppe VanellaDigestive and Liver Disease Unit, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Maria Chiara PetronePancreato-Biliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Centre, San Raffaele Scientific Institute IRCCS, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Paolo Giorgio ArcidiaconoPancreato-Biliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Centre, San Raffaele Scientific Institute IRCCS, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Yrjo VaalavuoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Alimentary Tract Surgery, Tampere University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-1494-2184
Luca FrulloniDepartment of Gastroenterology, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
J Enrique Dominguez-MuñozDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hospital Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Pierre H DeprezDepartment of Hepato-Gastroenterology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.
Massimo FalconiPancreatic Surgery Unit, Vita-Salute University, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Centre, San Raffaele Scientific Institute IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Marco Del ChiaroDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Denver, Colorado, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7400-013X
Stefano CrippaPancreatic Surgery Unit, Vita-Salute University, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Centre, San Raffaele Scientific Institute IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Johanna LaukkarinenDepartment of Gastroenterology and Alimentary Tract Surgery, Tampere University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University · ITCliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc · BEComplejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago · ESTampere University Hospital · FIUniversity of Verona · ITEuropean Institute of Oncology · ITKarolinska University Hospital · SEUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDifferent surveillance strategies for patients with low-risk branch-duct (BD) intraductal papillary neoplasm (IPMN) have been described. The aim of this study was to describe the natural history of low-risk BD-IPMN, and to identify risk factors for the development of worrisome features (WF)/high-risk stigmata (HRS) and of pancreatic malignancies.

methodsThis was a multicentre retrospective study of patients with BD-IPMN who were under active surveillance between January 2006 and December 2015. Patients were eligible if they had a low-risk lesion and had a minimum follow-up of 24 months. Outcomes were development of WF/HRS or cytologically/histologically confirmed malignant IPMN.

resultsOf 837 patients included, 168 (20 per cent) developed WF/HRS. At the end of the observation time, 132 patients (79 per cent) with WF/HRS were still under surveillance without progression to pancreatic cancer. Factors associated with the development of WF or HRS in multivariable analysis included localized nodules (versus diffuse: hazard ratio (HR) 0.43, 95 per cent c.i. 0.26 to 0.68), cyst size 15-19 mm (versus less than 15 mm: HR 1.88, 1.23 to 2.87) or at least 20 mm (versus less than 15 mm: HR 3.25, 2.30 to 4.60), main pancreatic duct size over 3 mm (versus 3 mm or less: HR 2.17, 1.41 to 3.34), and symptoms at diagnosis (versus no symptoms: HR 2.29, 1.52 to 3.45). Surveillance in an endoscopy-oriented centre was also associated with increased detection of WF or HRS (versus radiology-oriented: HR 2.46, 1.74 to 3.47).

conclusionConservative management of patients with low-risk BD-IPMN is safe and feasible.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalPancreatic Intraductal NeoplasmsPancreatic NeoplasmsHumansPancreatic DuctsRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID35511697
PMCPMC10364743
OpenAlexW4226176742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.