Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35511683›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2022

Body weight of newborn and suckling piglets affects their intestinal gene expression.

Sandra Villagómez-Estrada, José F Pérez, Diego Melo-Durán, Francesc Gonzalez-Solè, Matilde D'Angelo, Francisco J Pérez-Cano, David Solà-Oriol

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Short- and Long-Term Effects of Birth Weight and Neonatal Care in Pigs.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sandra Villagómez-EstradaDepartment of Animal and Food Science, Animal Nutrition and Welfare Service (SNIBA), Autonomous University of Barcelona, Bellaterra 08193, Spain.
José F PérezDepartment of Animal and Food Science, Animal Nutrition and Welfare Service (SNIBA), Autonomous University of Barcelona, Bellaterra 08193, Spain.
Diego Melo-DuránDepartment of Animal and Food Science, Animal Nutrition and Welfare Service (SNIBA), Autonomous University of Barcelona, Bellaterra 08193, Spain.
Francesc Gonzalez-SolèDepartment of Animal and Food Science, Animal Nutrition and Welfare Service (SNIBA), Autonomous University of Barcelona, Bellaterra 08193, Spain.
Matilde D'AngeloDepartment of Animal and Food Science, Animal Nutrition and Welfare Service (SNIBA), Autonomous University of Barcelona, Bellaterra 08193, Spain.
Francisco J Pérez-CanoDepartment of Biochemistry and Physiology, University of Barcelona, Barcelona 08007, Spain.
David Solà-OriolDepartment of Animal and Food Science, Animal Nutrition and Welfare Service (SNIBA), Autonomous University of Barcelona, Bellaterra 08193, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8365-340X
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESUniversitat de Barcelona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modern hyperprolific sows must deal with large litters (16-20 piglets) which reduce piglet birthweight with a concomitant increase in the proportion of small and intrauterine growth retarded piglets. However, larger litters do not only have a greater variation of piglet weights, but also a greater variation in colostrum and milk consumption within the litter. To further understand the impact that body weight has on piglets, the present study aimed to evaluate the degree of physiological weakness of the smallest piglets at birth and during the suckling period (20 d) compared to their middle-weight littermates through their jejunal gene expression. At birth, light piglets showed a downregulation of genes related to immune response (FAXDC2, HSPB1, PPARGC1α), antioxidant enzymes (SOD2m), digestive enzymes (ANPEP, IDO1, SI), and nutrient transporter (SLC39A4) (P < 0.05) but also a tendency for a higher mRNA expression of GBP1 (inflammatory regulator) and HSD11β1 (stress hormone) genes compared to their heavier littermates (P < 0.10). Excluding HSD11β1 gene, all these intestinal gene expression differences initially observed at birth between light and middle-weight piglets were stabilized at the end of the suckling period, when others appeared. Genes involved in barrier function (CLDN1), pro-inflammatory response (CXCL2, IL6, IDO1), and stress hormone signaling (HSD11β1) over-expressed compared to their middle-weight littermates (P < 0.05). In conclusion, at birth and at the end of suckling period, light body weight piglets seem to have a compromised gene expression and therefore impaired nutrient absorption, immune and stress responses compared to their heavier littermates.

Indexed as

ColostrumHormonesAnimalsAnimals, NewbornAnimals, SucklingBirth WeightBody WeightFemaleGene ExpressionLactationPregnancySwineHormonesbirthweightgene expressionhyperprolific sowsneonatal pigssuckling pigs

Identifiers

PMID35511683
PMCPMC9175296
OpenAlexW4229073202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.