Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35511680›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2023

Organization and engagement of a prefrontal-olfactory network during olfactory selective attention.

Hillary L Cansler, Estelle E In 't Zandt, Kaitlin S Carlson, Waseh T Khan, Minghong Ma, Daniel W Wesson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Hedonic hotspot in rat olfactory tubercle: map for mu-opioid, orexin, and muscimol enhancement of sucrose 'liking'.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Respiratory Coupled Oscillations as a Mechanism of Attention to the Olfactory Environment.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hillary L CanslerDepartment of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Center for Smell and Taste, Center for Addiction Research and Education, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, 1200 Newell Dr., Gainesville, FL 32610, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8267-0515
Estelle E In 't ZandtDepartment of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Center for Smell and Taste, Center for Addiction Research and Education, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, 1200 Newell Dr., Gainesville, FL 32610, United States.
Kaitlin S CarlsonDepartment of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Center for Smell and Taste, Center for Addiction Research and Education, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, 1200 Newell Dr., Gainesville, FL 32610, United States.
Waseh T KhanDepartment of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Center for Smell and Taste, Center for Addiction Research and Education, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, 1200 Newell Dr., Gainesville, FL 32610, United States.
Minghong MaDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, 110 Johnson Pavilion, 3610 Hamilton Walk, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States.
Daniel W WessonDepartment of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Center for Smell and Taste, Center for Addiction Research and Education, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, 1200 Newell Dr., Gainesville, FL 32610, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3192-3866

Funding

Olfactory Modulation of Respiration-Entrained Brain Activity and BehaviorR01DC006213 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MA, MINGHONG · 2005 to 2024
$8.2M
Striatal mechanisms for e-cigarette reinforcement by flavorantsR01DA049545 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DE BIASI, MARIELLA, MA, MINGHONG · 2019 to 2023
$3.2M
Linking Synucleinopathy and Dysfunction of Olfactory PathwaysR01DC016519 · NIDCD · VAN ANDEL RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI MOORE, DARREN JOHN, WESSON, DANIEL W · 2017 to 2021
$2.8M
Novel Role of a Ventral Striatal Circuit in Motor ControlR01NS117061 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI FUCCILLO, MARC V, MA, MINGHONG · 2021 to 2025
$2.4M
INTER-REGIONAL CODING OF ODOR VALENCE BY NEURAL ENSEMBLESR01DC014443 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI WESSON, DANIEL W · 2015 to 2019
$2.3M
Circuitry and function of ventral striatum subregionsR01DA049449 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI MA, MINGHONG, WESSON, DANIEL W · 2020 to 2024
$2.1M
Odor-directed attention and the medial prefrontal cortexF32DC018232 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI CANSLER, HILLARY LAUREN · 2019 to 2021
$195k
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA049449NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA049545NIDCD NIH HHS F32 DC018232NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC006213NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014443NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC016519NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS117061
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSensory perception is profoundly shaped by attention. Attending to an odor strongly regulates if and how it is perceived - yet the brain systems involved in this process are unknown. Here we report integration of the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), a collection of brain regions integral to attention, with the olfactory system in the context of selective attention to odors.

methodsFirst, we used tracing methods to establish the tubular striatum (TuS, also known as the olfactory tubercle) as the primary olfactory region to receive direct mPFC input in rats. Next, we recorded (i) local field potentials from the olfactory bulb (OB), mPFC, and TuS, or (ii) sniffing, while rats completed an olfactory selective attention task.

resultsGamma power and coupling of gamma oscillations with theta phase were consistently high as rats flexibly switched their attention to odors. Beta and theta synchrony between mPFC and olfactory regions were elevated as rats switched their attention to odors. Finally, we found that sniffing was consistent despite shifting attentional demands, suggesting that the mPFC-OB theta coherence is independent of changes in active sampling.

conclusionsTogether, these findings begin to define an olfactory attention network wherein mPFC activity, as well as that within olfactory regions, are coordinated based upon attentional states.

Indexed as

Olfactory BulbSmellAnimalsBrainOdorantsPrefrontal CortexRatsactive samplingneural circuitsneural oscillationsolfactory cortexprefrontal cortexsniffing

Identifiers

PMID35511680
PMCPMC9930634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.